official compiler for Solaris jdk9 build?

[Semyon Sadetsky]

How can I install them, just copy from sysroot/usr? Or it is possible to 
skip conftest?

--Semyon

On 6/5/2015 5:09 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Actually, we might have issues in configure if the standard headers 
> aren't available on the system. At least I have not tested that 
> scenario and I can imagine that our SYSROOT_CFLAGS aren't always used 
> in the configure tests. This is of course a bug, but a workaround 
> would be to have the system headers installed on the system. They 
> won't be used during the actual build.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2015-06-05 15:05, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Did you use the --with-devkit option?
>>
>> /Magnus
>>
>>> 5 jun 2015 kl. 10:47 skrev Semyon Sadetsky 
>>> <semyon.sadetsky at oracle.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have installed the devkit on clean Solaris 11.2 instance but 
>>> configure fails because compiler cannot find the includes path:
>>> c -o conftest    conftest.c  >&5
>>> "conftest.c", line 9: cannot find include file: <stdio.h>
>>> "conftest.c", line 13: undefined symbol: FILE
>>>
>>> though devkit & sysroot path was detected by configure.
>>> Any reasons why?
>>> I did not not install normal solaris studio only the devkit.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> --Semyon
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 6/3/2015 11:38 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/3/2015 11:28 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-06-02 17:27, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to build jdk9 under the current Solaris 11.2 version.
>>>>>> Which version of the Solaris Studio should be installed for that? 
>>>>>> The readme-builds states:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> At a minimum, the Studio 12 Update 1 Compilers (containing 
>>>>>> version 5.10 of the C and C++ compilers) is required, including 
>>>>>> specific patches.
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Currently there are 3 versions currently available for downloading:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2
>>>>>> Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3
>>>>>> Oracle Solaris Studio 12.4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried all 3 and only with 12.3 I do no receive build warnings 
>>>>>> about wrong compiler version,
>>>>>> but my build constantly fails with 12.3 with the next message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Compiling 246 files for jdk.jdi
>>>>>> "/jdk9/client/jdk/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/childproc.c", 
>>>>>> line 384: warning: statement not reached (E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED)
>>>>>> "/jdk9/client/jdk/src/java.base/unix/native/libjli/java_md_solinux.c", 
>>>>>> line 496: warning: statement not reached (E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED)
>>>>>> ld: fatal: file 
>>>>>> /jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/support/modules_libs/java.base/amd64/server/libjvm.so: 
>>>>>> not an ELF object
>>>>>> gmake[3]: *** 
>>>>>> [/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/support/modules_libs/java.base/amd64/libverify.so] 
>>>>>> Error 2
>>>>>> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>>>> gmake[2]: *** [java.base-libs] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even --disable-warnings-as-errors option does not save the build 
>>>>>> from failure.
>>>>> That's because the warning does not cause the build failure. Read 
>>>>> the logs again. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The real error here is "libjvm.so: not an ELF object" which causes 
>>>>> the linking to fail for libverify.so. The warning from libjava is 
>>>>> just a red herring.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your hotspot build is broken. Try
>>>>> "make clean-hotspot"
>>>>> "make hotspot"
>>>>> and see if you spot any errors. Otherwise you'd probably just left 
>>>>> the build in a bad state.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Magnus
>>>> Thank you. In reality it was even worse when I add the option 
>>>> disabling warnings as errors the VM hangs in the middle of the 
>>>> build and those messages I got after restarting it and running the 
>>>> incremental build. This scenario was reproduced 2 times with clean 
>>>> build. So, my next attempt is a clean install with devkits.
>>>>
>>>> --Semyon
>>>>
>>>>>> Could you send me the software list with the versions that should 
>>>>>> be installed on a clean Solaris 11.2 instance to have the build 
>>>>>> running smoothly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> --Semyon
>