[8u60] Request for approval to backport: 8067330: ZERO_ARCHDEF incorrectly defined for PPC/PPC64 architectures
Severin Gehwolf
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Mon Mar 2 17:00:36 UTC 2015
Hi,
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 16:56 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Hi Severin,
>
> I'd missed your previous request. It was marked as a review request!
Sorry, my bad.
> Consider this approved for jdk8u-dev. Can you add a 'noreg-build' label
> to the bug report ?
Done.
> Erik, would you be willing to push this changeset to the 8u-dev forest
> ? Looks like there's some closed code that needs updating also.
Many thanks!
Cheers,
Severin
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 02/03/15 16:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've sent this email before[1], but would like for this backport to get
> > into 8u60 before it closes this month[2]. The patch in question only
> > touches Zero make variables and should be fairly safe to backport. The
> > patch is the same (modulo autogen.sh generation timestamp) as for JDK 9.
> > I'd also please need a sponsor who can push this change for me.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Original 9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067330
> > webrev:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8067330/webrev.jdk8.01/
> >
> > JDK 9 review thread:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-December/013895.html
> >
> > Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Severin
> >
> > [1]
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2015-February/014394.html
> > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u60.html
> >
>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list