Review request for JDK-8141338: Move jdk.internal.dynalink package to jdk.dynalink

[Alan Bateman]

On 23/11/2015 15:27, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I integrated the changes Mandy suggested; please review these (build related) changes:
> jdk9 top level: <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8141338/webrev.jdk9.top.2/index.html>
> jdk9/jdk: <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8141338/webrev.jdk9.top.2/index.html>
>
> For the sake of completeness, the jdk/nashorn changes are here: <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8141338/webrev.jdk9> but they have already been reviewed by Hannes and Sundar; only the above two (jdk9 and jdk9/jdk) have been modified compared to the original review request.
>
> Sundar was kind enough to verify that JDK9 builds fine with these changes.
>
The jdk repo looks okay (just had to change your link to find it :-)

In the top-level repo then you've moved jdk.scripting.nashorn from 
PROVIDER_MODULES to MAIN_MODULES. The reason that we've had it in 
PROVIDER_MODULES is because we treat it as a service provider module (it 
provides an implementation of javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory).

-Alan.