RFR: JDK-8036003: Add --with-debug-symbols=[none|internal|external|zipped]

Yasumasa Suenaga yasuenag at gmail.com
Wed Nov 25 14:52:31 UTC 2015


Hi Magnus,

> --with-java-debug-symbols=none,all
> (or "none,internal" for consistency).

Can I change this option to --enable-java-debug-symbols ?
This value set to none or all. So I think that we should use AC_ARG_ENABLE for it.


Thanks,

Yasumasa


On 2015/11/25 23:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2015-11-21 14:12, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>>> My point with current proposal is that either it doesn't touch the zipping because we already have an option for that; or it should deprecate the existing option (now Erik has pointed out that capability).
>>
>> I'm using BASIC_DEPRECATED_ARG_ENABLE for debug-symbols and zip-debug-info in new webrev:
>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8036003/webrev.03/
>>
>> I had thought this new option as a wrapper for existing options.
>> However, if current options should be deprecated, I will follow it.
>
> Hi Yasumasa,
>
> Sorry for the delay in my response.
>
> I had to go back and re-read the old discussions and my personal notes about this. It turned out that some of the complications that existed then is not relevant from Oracle's point of view anymore (more specifically, stripping to several distinct levels). With that complication gone, the basic case boils down to the three ways of doing this:
> 1) Compile without debug information ("none")
> 2) Compile with debug information and keep it ("internal")
> 3) Compile with debug information, copy it to an external file, and strip the binary ("external")
>
> So far, so good. I agree with David Holmes that the zipping complicates things somewhat. The problem here is two-fold: Firstly, I believe that the "external" choice will be relevant to nobody (as in, neither the community nor Oracle), and secondly, there have been discussions of handling the external debuginfo differently (namely, to move all debug info, unzipped, into a separate image, and zip them all at once). It's a bit unfortunate if we create an interface to configure that cannot grow properly with future changes.
>
> On the other hand, it does seem convenient to express the end result for the Oracle build as "zipped" (or possibly "external-zipped", to emphasize  the connection to "external"?).
>
> So I'm not sure what to think myself. But if David agrees that adding "zipped" (or "external-zipped") to the new argument, and deprecating the old, then I agree with it as well. :-)
>
> The second discussion here is the connection between java and native debug symbols.
>
> Fact: We do not currently have a story for setting java debug symbols. That's bad, and a regression as pointed out.
> Fact: That does not mean it has to be fixed in this patch.
>
> I do think that java and native debug symbols are different things and should be treated differently. But I also think we should have configure arguments that show their similarity. So, I propose that we have a
> --with-native-debug-symbols=none,internal,external,zipped
> as you propose, and then also a
> --with-java-debug-symbols=none,all
> (or "none,internal" for consistency).
>
> I think it would be nice if that flag could be implemented in the same patch, but since it is a different thing I understand if you want to leave it out. There is some added complication here, since we already set -g for java compilation depending on debug level, and the native debug symbol patch is obviously tricky as it is.
>
> /Magnus



More information about the build-dev mailing list