RFR: JDK-8154326: bash >(...) construct causes race conditions

Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Fri Apr 22 08:12:33 UTC 2016


Looks ok.

Going forward, do you think we would be helped by a specially crafted native binary that does this for us with a single call? Something like the Windows path converter, but available on all platforms?

/Magnus

> 20 apr. 2016 kl. 17:20 skrev Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>:
> 
> Unfortunately, this did not work well. The problem with the added "&& wait" materializes if the caller of ExecuteWithLog tries to pipe the output of that command, which we do frequently on Windows. To solve it, another level of parentheses are needed. Unfortunately this adds another shell process for each call, which makes the Windows build slightly slower again. I don't see any other solution however.
> 
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8154326/webrev.02/
> 
> /Erik
> 
>> On 2016-04-19 14:32, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> After switching to the new hotspot build, we have seen some sporadic build errors related to the generation of dtrace JvmOffsets.h file on Solaris. The errors look like a compile target that depends on the header file fails because the header file is either empty or incomplete. I have managed to reproduce this by running this particular part of the build in a loop within 5 minutes.
>> 
>> The header file generation uses the rather new ExecuteWithLog macro, which uses the also rather new ">(tee logfile)" construct to save output to a log file while still echoing both stderr and stdout separately to the console. It seems however, that when using this construct, bash spawns background processes which may not be done when the main process is done.
>> 
>> I have noted a similar effect when switching to this construct for the main makefile build.log. The last line of make output would be echoed to the console after my prompt returned.
>> 
>> To solve this, I added "&& wait" in each location where the >(...) trick is used. I have then rerun the loop over night and could no longer reproduce the problem. I believe this to be the proper solution.
>> 
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154326
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8154326/webrev.01/
>> 
>> /Erik
> 



More information about the build-dev mailing list