[9-dev] RfR: JDK-8132743: Move netscape.javascript package from jdk.plugin to new module

David DeHaven david.dehaven at oracle.com
Fri Mar 4 01:06:00 UTC 2016


Adding it to MAIN_MODULES, I now see it in bootmodules.jimage:
/jdk.jsobject/jdk/internal/netscape/javascript/spi/JSObjectProvider.class
/jdk.jsobject/netscape/javascript/JSException.class
/jdk.jsobject/netscape/javascript/JSObject$ProviderLoader$1.class
/jdk.jsobject/netscape/javascript/JSObject$ProviderLoader.class
/jdk.jsobject/netscape/javascript/JSObject.class

-DrD-

> jdk9-dev is not the right mailing list.  I bcc’ed it and add jigsaw-dev instead.
> 
> 
>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Looks OK to me. I did a quick test build and I can see the new package in the exploded JDK, but not in the images. Maybe I did something wrong?
>> 
> 
> Good catch.
> 
> jdk.jsobject needs to be added in MAIN_MODULES list in make/Images.gmk
> 
> Mandy
> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> David DeHaven wrote:
>>>>> JBS Issue:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132743
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Code review:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8132743/webrev.0/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Looks okay.  There is no @since - I guess it’s okay because netscape.javascript has been shipped with plugin for long time.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I can't track down when it was first included. It pre-dates anything I've looked at so far.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> package-info.java
>>>>   "when running in an {@link java.applet.Applet Applet}” - is this true when running with JavaFX webkit?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yes, I believe so, assuming you have a JSObject representing the root window object. Maybe that should be reworded, I think just remove the "when running in an Applet" part.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> JSObject.java
>>>>  @throws JSException is missing in the methods
>>>> 
>>>>  Does it throw NPE if the parameter is null?  Or JSException - that needs to be specified.
>>>> 
>>>>  Nit: it’d be good to wrap null with {@code null} in the javadoc.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ok. I can fix that.
>>> 
>>> -DrD-
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 




More information about the build-dev mailing list