small changes, long build time
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon May 2 02:14:35 UTC 2016
On 1/05/2016 4:22 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> On 01/05/2016 05:21, David Holmes wrote:
>>
>> The native code - java.c. Can't see any reason for jmods to be
>> recreated every time I recompile that!
> The packaged modules contain the tools/launcher for that module. So if
> you touch java.c then the launchers for every tool are re-generated and
> thus the packaged modules needs to be re-generated too.
Ouch!
> In jdk9/dev then anything that transitively depends on any of these
> modules needs its packaged module re-created too because the packaged
> module has hashes of its dependences to avoid linking modules from
> different JDK builds. It's slightly different in the refresh that will
> be in jdk9/dev in a few days. In the refresh then the hashes are stored
> in java.base and so the only additional packaged module that needs to be
> re-created is java.base.jmod.
Sounds somewhat better.
>
>>
>> Sure. But they shouldn't need to be recreated unless something
>> relating to their content has changed.
> jlink isn't incremental so if you are using an "images" build then the
> runtime images will be re-created whenever anything has changed.
So jlink basically copies what is needed for a given configuration into
the "image" destination? So where previously this was handled in the
makefile and only what had changed needed copying, jlink will re-copy
everything?
David
> -Alan
More information about the build-dev
mailing list