[10] Request for review and approval: JDK-8177770: Need more precise control on build system logging
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Mar 30 10:02:40 UTC 2017
On 30/03/2017 8:00 PM, alexey semenyuk wrote:
> David,
>
> I did quite a lot JPRT builds wit various values of LOG Make variable to
> verify the changes are not breaking windows, linux, solaris and OSX builds.
Ok.
Thanks,
David
> Thanks,
> Alexey
>
> On 30.03.2017 10:13, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 30/03/2017 5:10 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-30 03:04, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>>
>>>> Can't really review the details of this but wanted to ensure that this
>>>> gets tested on all platforms before being pushed. Internally use JPRT
>>>> and "-testset hotspot", but you should also reach out to the AIX-port
>>>> folk to ensure it works as expected there too.
>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> What are your worries here? There are no platform-dependent changes,
>>> apart from the actual logging script which might not work properly if
>>> your local copy of time/flock is non-compliant. (We try to test for
>>> this, at least for "time".) Unless you're running with LOG=profile, this
>>> patch affects nothing.
>>
>> Just want to make sure it doesn't cause any unexpected failures on
>> less mainstream OS.
>>
>>> If the profiling does not work properly on e.g. AIX, then some of the
>>> AIX folks would need to supply an additional patch to update
>>> shell-profiler.sh.
>>
>> Sure. But it would be nice to not break things first. Some
>> contributors continually pull OpenJDK changes and run them through
>> their own build and test systems.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>> /Magnus
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> On 30/03/2017 2:21 AM, alexey semenyuk wrote:
>>>>> Please review and approve enhancement for JDK10.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177770
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asemenyuk/8177770/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alexey
>>>>>
>>>
>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list