RFR: JDK-8188312 Use CDS if present when running the Boot JDK during build
Erik Joelsson
erik.joelsson at oracle.com
Tue Oct 3 14:45:49 UTC 2017
The change looks good, but unfortunately I don't see a lot of gain.
First of all it seems the -XX:SharedArchiveFile option removes a lot of
the performance gain. Here are some rough numbers from my machine. All
of them are "time make images" with a clean build directory, on a 16
core/32 threads linux box. In some cases I did two runs, which further
shows the amount of variance in the build time.
Baseline: boot jdk 8, no cds
real 3m14.688s
user 38m34.132s
sys 5m4.032s
real 3m11.086s
user 38m16.820s
sys 4m35.344s
Magnus second patch: boot jdk 8, cds SharedArchiveFile
real 3m6.268s
user 38m9.168s
sys 4m13.392s
real 3m15.985s
user 37m55.328s
sys 3m50.140s
Magnus first patch: boot jdk 8, cds in classes.jsa
real 2m55.972s
user 37m59.636s
sys 4m1.020s
Baseline with boot jdk 9, no cds
real 3m14.262s
user 40m9.216s
sys 5m5.480s
Magnus first patch: boot jdk 9, cds in classes.jsa
real 3m12.721s
user 39m29.332s
sys 4m25.472s
Magnus second patch: boot jdk 9, -XX:SharedArchiveFile,
-XX:-VerifySharedSpaces
real 3m4.297s
user 39m24.556s
sys 4m31.980s
So from this (certainly limited) data set, the only configuration that
shows meaningful improvement is with boot jdk 8 and the first patch,
where we stealth add classes.jsa to the boot jdk. I find this a very bad
thing to do in principle so would vote against such a solution anyway.
Also note that we will switch default boot from 8 to 9 very soon, so
it's really the results on 9 that are relevant here. In 9, there is
another option, -XX:-VerifySharedSpaces which removes most of the
overhead added by -XX:SharedArchiveFile. Perhaps using that this becomes
worth while.
I would like to see more data showing the optimization is actually
relevant. On my machine it seems to make a measurable difference, but
not a very significant one.
One note on the proposed change. While working on this, when I changed
my boot jdk, configure did not regenerate the classes.jsa file. I
believe for safety we should regenerate on every configure run. It's not
that expensive anyway.
/Erik
On 2017-10-03 14:55, David Holmes wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 3/10/2017 10:47 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> On 2017-10-03 14:21, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Erik J. raises a good point in the bug report that
>>> -XX:SharedArchiveFile=xxx should be used if we create the archive.
>>> The build system has no business creating an archive inside the boot
>>> JDK.
>>
>> Agree, that is a better solution. I was not aware of the
>> -XX:SharedArchiveFile option.
>>
>> Here's an updated webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8188312-use-CDS-for-bootjdk/webrev.02
>>
>>
>> I create the jsa file in configure-support, that way it can survive a
>> "make clean".
>>
>> /Magnus
>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 3/10/2017 9:02 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hi Claes,
>>>>
>>>> On 3/10/2017 8:48 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Xshare:auto silently ignores failures to map the shared archive
>>>>> and should be safe to use. I think you're thinking of -Xshare:on
>>>>> which will fail/abort the VM if mapping fails.
>>>>
>>>> Ah okay.
>>>>
>>>> In that case seems reasonable. But please test thoroughly across
>>>> all platforms in JPRT.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>> /Claes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2017-10-03 12:28, David Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Magnus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I just put in the bug report, it isn't quite this simple. You
>>>>>> have to be able to tolerate/recover from failure to map the
>>>>>> shared archive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/10/2017 8:24 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>>>>>> We should use CDS to minimize Java startup time during build. We
>>>>>>> run multiple Java commands, and every second counts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On my machine, I get a ~3% build time speedup with this fix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188312
>>>>>>> WebRev:
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8188312-use-CDS-for-bootjdk/webrev.01
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Magnus
>>>>>
>>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list