RFR(M): 8200126: [TESTBUG] Open source VM runtime signal tests

[mikhailo]

David, Christian, Magnus,

Thank you for review.


Misha


On 04/03/2018 05:15 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 09:30, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Misha.
>>
>> This all seems okay.
>>
>> On 30/03/2018 12:41 PM, Mikhailo Seledtsov wrote:
>>> While testing I discovered build errors on Mac and Solaris. The 
>>> following statement " 
>>> BUILD_HOTSPOT_JTREG_EXECUTABLES_LIBS_exesigtest := -ljvm" was added 
>>> to a Linux-only block. I have updated the make file to add this for 
>>> any platform w/o conditions; the " exesigtest.c" is excluded from 
>>> Windows anyway down below in the make file. I am not 100% sure this 
>>> is the correct way to modify the make file; if not please advise the 
>>> correct way.
>>
>> That works for me. I'm not sure how Magnus envisaged this being used 
>> though. An alternative would be:
>>
>>   ifeq ($(OPENJDK_TARGET_OS), windows)
>>       BUILD_HOTSPOT_JTREG_EXECUTABLES_CFLAGS_exeFPRegs := -MT
>> +     BUILD_HOTSPOT_JTREG_EXCLUDE += exesigtest.c
>> + else
>> +     BUILD_HOTSPOT_JTREG_EXECUTABLES_LIBS_exesigtest := -ljvm
>>   endif
>>
>> but I think your version is more future-proof.
>
> Either works. If I "envisaged" anything, I think it was more in lines 
> of David's suggestion here, but it really doesn't matter. The current 
> version is fine as it is.
>
> So, build changes looks good to me.
>
> /Magnus
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>> With this fix all 4 builds pass.
>>>
>>> Here is the updated webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mseledtsov/8200126.02.open/index.html
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Misha
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/29/18, 4:00 PM, mikhailo wrote:
>>>> I have addressed feedback from Christian, David and Magnus. Here is 
>>>> the updated webrev:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mseledtsov/8200126.01.open/index.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have also confirmed that output from exesigtest.c printf() is 
>>>> logged into .jtr files.
>>>>
>>>>       Grepped for "signal", I can see the output such as:
>>>>           TestSigxfsz.jtr:SIGXFSZ: signal handler using function 
>>>> 'sigset' has been set
>>>>           TestSigxfsz.jtr:SIGXFSZ: signal handler for signal 25 has 
>>>> been processed
>>>>           TestSigxfsz.jtr:SIGXFSZ: signal has been sent successfully
>>>>           TestSigxfsz.jtr:SIGXFSZ: signal has been received
>>>>       Also can see other output from the printf, such as all initVM 
>>>> logs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Misha
>>>>
>>>> On 03/29/2018 02:49 PM, mikhailo wrote:
>>>>> Magnus,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for advice. I have updated the makefile accordingly. 
>>>>> Will post updated webrev shortly.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Misha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/28/2018 03:26 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, you seem to have based this off an old version of 
>>>>>> JtregNativeHotspot.gmk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you update the file I think you see how you should do it, but 
>>>>>> I'll give you some help:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ifeq ($(OPENJDK_TARGET_OS), windows)
>>>>>>   BUILD_HOTSPOT_JTREG_EXECUTABLES_CFLAGS_exeFPRegs := -MT
>>>>>>   BUILD_HOTSPOT_JTREG_EXCLUDE += exesigtest.c
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>
>>>>
>