JDK 12 RFR of JDK-8205615: Start of release updates for JDK 12 / JDK-8205621: Increment JDK version for JDK 12

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Jun 25 23:13:04 UTC 2018


Hi Joe,

On 26/06/2018 4:10 AM, joe darcy wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> With the JDK 11 and 12 split fast approaching [1], it is time to work on 
> the various start of release update tasks for JDK 12. Those tasks are 
> being tracked under the umbrella bug JDK-8205615: "Start of release 
> updates for JDK 12".
> 
> This thread is to review the build-related portions of the work 
> including JDK-8205621: "Increment JDK version for JDK 12." Current webrev:
> 
>      http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8205615.4/

make/autoconf/version-numbers

If we're going to ensure we bump the version and classfile version 
together then we should be able to restore:

DEFAULT_VERSION_CLASSFILE_MAJOR=56  # "`$EXPR $DEFAULT_VERSION_FEATURE + 
44`"

to just:

DEFAULT_VERSION_CLASSFILE_MAJOR="`$EXPR $DEFAULT_VERSION_FEATURE + 44`"

Possibly we could also set:

DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_BOOT_VERSIONS

to use DEFAULT_VERSION_FEATURE, DEFAULT_VERSION_FEATURE-1 
DEFAULT_VERSION_FEATURE-2 ? If that is our boot JDK policy. Or will we 
drop 10 at some point in the process?

---

make/common/SetupJavaCompilers.gmk

Again if we're bumping everything en-masse can we use 
DEFAULT_VERSION_FEATURE instead of hard-wiring 12?

And should these be using --release instead of -source + -target?

---

Thanks,
David

> A handful of test failures still need to be addressed, so there will be 
> some minor adjustments to the aggregate set of changes before they are 
> pushed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Joe
> 
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2018-June/001462.html
> 



More information about the build-dev mailing list