11 RFR (XS) 8205956: Fix usage of “OpenJDK” in build and test instructions

[mark.reinhold at oracle.com]

2018/6/29 3:03:09 -0700, volker.simonis at gmail.com:
> This still doesn't explain why replacing one trademark with another
> one is helpful here.

Perhaps some trademarks are more important than others.

> After Phil's remark, OpenJDK doesn't even seem to be registered as a
> trademark, so in that sense the old version "Building the OpenJDK"
> seemed to be even more trademark law compliant.

I’m not qualified to engage in a legal argument, in this or any other
forum, and neither is Phil.  In this matter I am following the advice of
Oracle’s legal department regarding the usage of Oracle’s trademarks.

> And by the way, I totally agree with Aleksey that changes shouldn't be
> pushed if reviewers raise concerns (at least not before these concerns
> have been addressed).

My apologies.  I had no idea this would turn out to be such a volatile
issue.

- Mark