RFR (M): JDK-8200298 Unify all unix versions of libjsig/jsig.c

Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Wed Mar 28 10:15:03 UTC 2018


On 2018-03-27 18:24, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> just a cursory look, will look in greater detail tomorrow.
>
> This is good, thanks for doing this.
>
> As I wrote offlist, please remove the painfully wrong AIX 
> "workarounds". I do not know why we did this - the original code is 
> quite old - my assumption is that dlsym(RTLD_NEXT) was not working as 
> expected on older AIX versions. Well, it should work now according to 
> IBMs manpages. Will test later.
Ok.
>
> __thread is not Posix. I would prefer pthread_get/set_specific 
> instead, which is more portable.

I have surrounded this code with #ifdef MACOSX now.

Here is an updated webrev. It includes the changes requested by you and 
David:

* No more AIX workarounds
* Solaris use pthreads
* The "reentry" code is #ifdef MACOSX.

I also assumed that NSIG is available and working on Solaris. I'll let 
David decide if he is happy with that. The alternative is to go back to 
the Solaris-specific code that allocates sact on the heap.

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8200298-unify-libjsig/webrev.05

Once again, here is also a webrev that shows the difference between the 
original files and the new, unified file. Even if it's hard to read, it 
shows what the effects will be for each platform.

Webrev: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8200298-unify-libjsig/webrev.04/

/Magnus

>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie 
> <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com <mailto:magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>> 
> wrote:
>
>     When I was about to update jsig.c, I noticed that the four copies
>     for aix, linux, macosx and solaris were basically the same, with
>     only small differences. Some of the differences were not even well
>     motivated, but were likely the result of this code duplication
>     causing the code to diverge.
>
>     A better solution is to unify them all into a single unix version,
>     with the few platform-specific changes handled on a per-platform
>     basis.
>
>     I've made the following notable changes:
>
>     * I have removed the version check for Solaris. All other
>     platforms seem to do fine without it, and in general, we don't
>     mistrust other JDK libraries. An alternative is to add this
>     version check to all other platforms instead. If you think this is
>     the correct course of action, let me know and I'll fix it.
>
>     * Solaris used to have a dynamically allocated sact, instead of a
>     statically allocated array as all other platforms have. It's not
>     likely to be large, and the size is known at compile time, so
>     there seems to be no good reason for this.
>
>     * Linux and macosx used a uint32_t/uint64_t instead of sigset_t
>     for jvmsigs, as aix and solaris do. This is a less robust
>     solution, and the added checks show that it has failed in the
>     past. Now all platforms use sigset_t/sigismember().
>
>     Also worth noting:
>
>     * Solaris is not using pthreads, but it's own thread library,
>     which accounts for most of the #ifdef SOLARIS.
>
>     * In general, if an implementation was needed on one platform, but
>     has no effect or is harmless on others, I've kept it on all
>     platforms instead of sprinkling the code with #ifdefs.
>
>     To facilitate code review, here is a specially crafted webrev that
>     shows the differences compared to each of the individual, original
>     per-OS versions of jsig.c:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8200298-unify-libjsig/webrev.01
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eihse/JDK-8200298-unify-libjsig/webrev.01>
>
>     Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200298
>     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200298>
>     WebRev:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8200298-unify-libjsig/webrev.03
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eihse/JDK-8200298-unify-libjsig/webrev.03>
>
>     /Magnus
>
>




More information about the build-dev mailing list