[llvm-dev] OpenJDK8 failed to work after compiled by LLVM 8 for X86
Leslie Zhai
zhaixiang at loongson.cn
Tue Sep 11 16:09:27 UTC 2018
Hi Dimitry,
Thank you so much for the reduced testcase! It is able to reproduce
after compiled with clang-8 optimized for X86:
$ clang++ -O3 -S -c JDK-8205969.cpp -o JDK-8205969-opt-8.0.s
$ clang++ -O3 -c JDK-8205969.cpp -o JDK-8205969-opt-8.0.o
$ clang++ -o JDK-8205969-opt-8.0.out JDK-8205969-opt-8.0.o
$ ./JDK-8205969-opt-8.0.out
Segmentation fault
$ cat JDK-8205969-opt-8.0.s
.text
.file "JDK-8205969.cpp"
.globl main # -- Begin function main
.p2align 4, 0x90
.type main, at function
main: # @main
.cfi_startproc
# %bb.0:
xorps %xmm0, %xmm0
movups %xmm0, _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE+16(%rip)
movups %xmm0, _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE(%rip)
xorl %eax, %eax
retq
.Lfunc_end0:
.size main, .Lfunc_end0-main
.cfi_endproc
# -- End function
.type _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, at object #
@_ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
.section .rodata,"a", at progbits
^--- READ-ONLY segment
.globl _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
.p2align 3
_ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE:
.zero 32
.size _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, 32
.ident "LLVM China clang version 8.0.0
(git at github.com:llvm-mirror/clang.git
81ef98628ebf5186d746c0986dcbf5073e842043)
(git at github.com:llvm-mirror/llvm.git
e1aac9723d55497e74d83d216329f08d9842e494) (based on LLVM 8.0.0svn)"
.section ".note.GNU-stack","", at progbits
.addrsig
But it is *not* able to reproduce with clang-8 not optimized for X86:
$ clang++ -O0 -S -c JDK-8205969.cpp -o JDK-8205969-unopt-8.0.s
$ clang++ -O0 -c JDK-8205969.cpp -o JDK-8205969-unopt-8.0.o
$ clang++ -o JDK-8205969-unopt-8.0.out JDK-8205969-unopt-8.0.o
$ ./JDK-8205969-unopt-8.0.out
No segfault
$ cat JDK-8205969-unopt-8.0.s
.text
.file "JDK-8205969.cpp"
.section .text.startup,"ax", at progbits
.p2align 4, 0x90 # -- Begin function
__cxx_global_var_init
.type __cxx_global_var_init, at function
__cxx_global_var_init: # @__cxx_global_var_init
.cfi_startproc
# %bb.0:
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset %rbp, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
movabsq $_ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, %rdi
callq _ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
retq
.Lfunc_end0:
.size __cxx_global_var_init, .Lfunc_end0-__cxx_global_var_init
.cfi_endproc
# -- End function
.section
.text._ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev,"axG", at progbits,_ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev,comdat
.weak _ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev # -- Begin function
_ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev
.p2align 4, 0x90
.type _ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev, at function
_ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev: # @_ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev
.cfi_startproc
# %bb.0:
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset %rbp, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
movq %rdi, -8(%rbp)
movq -8(%rbp), %rdi
movl $0, -12(%rbp)
movq %rdi, -24(%rbp) # 8-byte Spill
.LBB1_1: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
cmpl $4, -12(%rbp)
jge .LBB1_4
# %bb.2: # in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
movslq -12(%rbp), %rax
movq -24(%rbp), %rcx # 8-byte Reload
movq $0, (%rcx,%rax,8)
# %bb.3: # in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
movl -12(%rbp), %eax
addl $1, %eax
movl %eax, -12(%rbp)
jmp .LBB1_1
.LBB1_4:
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
retq
.Lfunc_end1:
.size _ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev,
.Lfunc_end1-_ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev
.cfi_endproc
# -- End function
.text
.globl main # -- Begin function main
.p2align 4, 0x90
.type main, at function
main: # @main
.cfi_startproc
# %bb.0:
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset %rbp, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
subq $16, %rsp
movl $0, -4(%rbp)
movabsq $_ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, %rdi
callq _ZN15NativeCallStackC2Ev
xorl %eax, %eax
addq $16, %rsp
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
retq
.Lfunc_end2:
.size main, .Lfunc_end2-main
.cfi_endproc
# -- End function
.section .text.startup,"ax", at progbits
.p2align 4, 0x90 # -- Begin function
_GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp
.type _GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp, at function
_GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp: # @_GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp
.cfi_startproc
# %bb.0:
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset %rbp, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
callq __cxx_global_var_init
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
retq
.Lfunc_end3:
.size _GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp,
.Lfunc_end3-_GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp
.cfi_endproc
# -- End function
.type _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, at object #
@_ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
.bss
^--- R/W segment
.globl _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
.p2align 3
_ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE:
.zero 32
.size _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, 32
.section .init_array,"aw", at init_array
.p2align 3
.quad _GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp
.ident "LLVM China clang version 8.0.0
(git at github.com:llvm-mirror/clang.git
81ef98628ebf5186d746c0986dcbf5073e842043)
(git at github.com:llvm-mirror/llvm.git
e1aac9723d55497e74d83d216329f08d9842e494) (based on LLVM 8.0.0svn)"
.section ".note.GNU-stack","", at progbits
.addrsig
.addrsig_sym __cxx_global_var_init
.addrsig_sym _GLOBAL__sub_I_JDK_8205969.cpp
.addrsig_sym _ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
----- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< ---
Furthermore clang-3.9.1 *optimized* for X86 is *not* able to reproduce
the issue neither. It behaviors like gcc-6.4.1 and gcc-8. But I will
also check out clang-8 -O3/-O0 for mips64el.
And I am building LLVM 5.0.2 for X86, if still *not* able to
reproduce, it might be reduced the issue to [6, +∞) version range. I
will dig deep-into which commit/review bring in the issue.
在 2018年09月11日 16:55, Dimitry Andric 写道:
> Hi Leslie,
>
> The problem really lies in the OpenJDK code, as it is attempting to
> write to a const object. If this seems to work with certain compiler(s)
> and optimization settings, it is just luck. :-)
>
> Here is a reduced example, which shows the issue:
>
> ======================================================================
> #include <new>
>
> class NativeCallStack {
> public:
> static const NativeCallStack EMPTY_STACK;
>
> private:
> enum { DEPTH = 4 };
> void* stack[DEPTH];
>
> public:
> NativeCallStack() {
> for (int i = 0; i < DEPTH; ++i) {
> stack[i] = nullptr;
> }
> }
> };
>
> const NativeCallStack NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK;
>
> int main(void)
> {
> // The following should segfault, if EMPTY_STACK was placed into .rodata.
> ::new ((void*)&NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK) NativeCallStack();
> return 0;
> }
> ======================================================================
>
> clang 7.0.0 rc2 produces this assembly:
>
> .globl main # -- Begin function main
> .p2align 4, 0x90
> .type main, at function
> main: # @main
> .cfi_startproc
> # %bb.0: # %entry
> pushq %rbp
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> .cfi_offset %rbp, -16
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
> xorps %xmm0, %xmm0
> movups %xmm0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
> movups %xmm0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
> xorl %eax, %eax
> popq %rbp
> .cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
> retq
> .Lfunc_end0:
> .size main, .Lfunc_end0-main
> .cfi_endproc
> # -- End function
> .type NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, at object # @NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK
> .section .rodata,"a", at progbits
> .globl NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK
> .p2align 3
> NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK:
> .zero 32
> .size NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, 32
>
> The whole constructor has been optimized out, and EMPTY_STACK has been
> replaced by .zero 32, placed in the .rodata segment, which is a
> perfectly valid transformation.
>
> Then, in main(), an attempt is made to write to that read-only segment,
> which will usually segfault, depending on how strictly the underlying
> operating system enforces these protections.
>
> In contrast, gcc 8.2.0 produces:
>
> .globl main
> .type main, @function
> main:
> .LFB74:
> .cfi_startproc
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
> xorl %eax, %eax
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+8(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+24(%rip)
> ret
> .cfi_endproc
> .LFE74:
> .size main, .-main
> .p2align 4,,15
> .type _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, @function
> _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE:
> .LFB76:
> .cfi_startproc
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+8(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+24(%rip)
> ret
> .cfi_endproc
> .LFE76:
> .size _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE, .-_GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
> .section .ctors,"aw", at progbits
> .align 8
> .quad _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
> .globl NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK
> .bss
> .align 32
> .type NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, @object
> .size NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, 32
> NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK:
> .zero 32
>
> Here you can see that gcc decided to not place EMPTY_STACK in .rodata,
> but in .bss, which is read/write. It adds the global constructor to
> the .ctors section, so the dynamic linker is made responsible for
> calling it.
>
> Note that now the EMPTY_STACK object is unnecessarily initialized twice,
> once by the global constructor, and once in main.
>
> -Dimitry
>
>> On 11 Sep 2018, at 03:38, Leslie Zhai <zhaixiang at loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dimitry,
>>
>> Thanks for your kind response!
>>
>> Thanks for the commit message of Jung's patch, I found that the bug had been fixed in OpenJDK 12 by Zhengyu https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205965 But only backported to 11. So Jung could backport it for OpenJDK 8, thanks a lot!
>>
>> But I argue that the root cause might be in the compiler side, why clang-3.9.1, gcc-6.4.1 couldn't reproduce the bug? And it might be work for clang-4.0 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208494 I will test LLVM 5 to check out whether or not reproducible.
>>
>>
>> 在 2018年09月11日 00:59, Dimitry Andric 写道:
>>> Hi Leslie,
>>>
>>> This is likely the same problem as was reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/225054#c8, and fixed by the following patch:
>>>
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/java/openjdk8/files/patch-hotspot_src_share_vm_services_memTracker.cpp?view=markup&pathrev=459368
>>>
>>> Can you please try that out, and see if it fixes it for you too?
>>>
>>> -Dimitry
>>>
>>>> On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:20, Leslie Zhai via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> OpenJDK8 jdk8u-dev[1] is just able to work after compiled with LLVM 3.9.1 for X86:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-slowdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version
>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0-internal-debug"
>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-internal-debug-xiangzhai_2018_09_09_21_08-b00)
>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.71-b00-debug, mixed mode)
>>>>
>>>> $ strings ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-slowdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java | grep clang
>>>> clang version 3.9.1 (tags/RELEASE_391/final)
>>>>
>>>> But it failed to work after compiled with LLVM 8 for X86:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version
>>>> Segmentation fault
>>>>
>>>> $ gdb --ex run --args ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version
>>>> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.12.1-48.fc25
>>>> ...
>>>> Starting program: /home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version
>>>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>>>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
>>>>
>>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>> [ Legend: Modified register | Code | Heap | Stack | String ]
>>>> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ registers ]────
>>>> $rax : 0x0
>>>> $rbx : 0x0
>>>> $rcx : 0x7ffff7315eb0 → 0x00007ffff6ae30a0 → <NativeCallStack::print_on(outputStream*)+0> xor edx, edx
>>>> $rdx : 0x0
>>>> $rsp : 0x7fffffff9328 → 0x00007ffff6a76822 → <MemTracker::init_tracking_level()+178> mov edi, ebx
>>>> $rbp : 0x7fffffff93c0 → 0x00007fffffff94f0 → 0x00007fffffff9510 → 0x0000000000000002
>>>> $rsi : 0x0
>>>> $rdi : 0x7ffff7315e70 → 0x00007ffff7315eb0 → 0x00007ffff6ae30a0 → <NativeCallStack::print_on(outputStream*)+0> xor edx, edx
>>>> $rip : 0x7ffff6ae2f5b → <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov QWORD PTR [rdi], rcx
>>>> $r8 : 0x1
>>>> $r9 : 0xf
>>>> $r10 : 0x64
>>>> $r11 : 0x0
>>>> $r12 : 0x7fffffffdc88 → 0x00007fffffffe04c → "/home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/build/linux-x86[...]"
>>>> $r13 : 0x7fffffffdca0 → 0x00007fffffffe0bf → "XDG_VTNR=1"
>>>> $r14 : 0x7fffffff9330 → "NMT_LEVEL_10535"
>>>> $r15 : 0x6
>>>> $eflags: [carry parity adjust zero sign trap INTERRUPT direction overflow RESUME virtualx86 identification]
>>>> $ss: 0x002b $ds: 0x0000 $cs: 0x0033 $es: 0x0000 $gs: 0x0000 $fs: 0x0000
>>>> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ stack ]────
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9328│+0x00: 0x00007ffff6a76822 → <MemTracker::init_tracking_level()+178> mov edi, ebx ← $rsp
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9330│+0x08: "NMT_LEVEL_10535" ← $r14
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9338│+0x10: 0x0035333530315f4c ("L_10535"?)
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9340│+0x18: 0x0000000000000001
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9348│+0x20: 0x0000000000602190 → 0x00007ffff5eb7000 → 0x00010102464c457f
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9350│+0x28: 0x0000000000000004
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9358│+0x30: 0x000000066474e551
>>>> 0x00007fffffff9360│+0x38: 0x0000000000000000
>>>> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ code:i386:x86-64 ]────
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f4b <print_owned_locks_on_error(outputStream*)+187> add eax, 0x1f0f00
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f50 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov rcx, QWORD PTR [rip+0x842781] # 0x7ffff73256d8
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f57 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> add rcx, 0x10
>>>> → 0x7ffff6ae2f5b <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov QWORD PTR [rdi], rcx
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f5e <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov DWORD PTR [rdi+0x28], 0x0
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f65 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> add rdi, 0x8
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f69 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> test edx, edx
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f6b <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> je 0x7ffff6ae2f7b <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int, bool)+43>
>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f6d <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov eax, esi
>>>> ─────────[ source:/home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/nativeCallStack.cpp+33 ]────
>>>> 28 #include "utilities/nativeCallStack.hpp"
>>>> 29
>>>> 30 const NativeCallStack NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(0, false);
>>>> 31
>>>> 32 NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int toSkip, bool fillStack) :
>>>> → 33 _hash_value(0) {
>>>> 34
>>>> 35 #if !PLATFORM_NATIVE_STACK_WALKING_SUPPORTED
>>>> 36 fillStack = false;
>>>> 37 #endif
>>>> 38
>>>> ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ threads ]────
>>>> [#0] Id 1, Name: "java", stopped, reason: SIGSEGV
>>>> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ trace ]────
>>>> [#0] 0x7ffff6ae2f5b → Name: NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(this=0x7ffff7315e70 <NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK>, toSkip=0x0, fillStack=0x0)
>>>> [#1] 0x7ffff6a76822 → Name: MemTracker::init_tracking_level()
>>>> [#2] 0x7ffff62eff49 → Name: MemTracker::tracking_level()
>>>> [#3] 0x7ffff62eff49 → Name: ResourceObj::operator new(size=0x20, type=ResourceObj::STACK_OR_EMBEDDED, flags=<optimized out>)
>>>> [#4] 0x7ffff61369ec → Name: _GLOBAL__sub_I_c1_Greedy.cpp()
>>>> [#5] 0x7ffff7de7d9a → Name: call_init(l=<optimized out>, argc=0x2, argv=0x7fffffffdc88, env=0x7fffffffdca0)
>>>> [#6] 0x7ffff7de7eab → Name: call_init(env=0x7fffffffdca0, argv=0x7fffffffdc88, argc=0x2, l=<optimized out>)
>>>> [#7] 0x7ffff7de7eab → Name: _dl_init(main_map=0x602190, argc=0x2, argv=0x7fffffffdc88, env=0x7fffffffdca0)
>>>> [#8] 0x7ffff7dece46 → Name: dl_open_worker(a=0x7fffffff97e0)
>>>> [#9] 0x7ffff7de7c44 → Name: _dl_catch_error(objname=0x7fffffff97d0, errstring=0x7fffffff97d8, mallocedp=0x7fffffff97cf, operate=0x7ffff7decae0 <dl_open_worker>, args=0x7fffffff97e0)
>>>> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
>>>> 0x00007ffff6ae2f5b in NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack (this=0x7ffff7315e70 <NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK>, toSkip=0x0, fillStack=0x0) at /home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/nativeCallStack.cpp:33
>>>> 33 _hash_value(0) {
>>>> gef➤ c
>>>> Continuing.
>>>>
>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>> The program no longer exists.
>>>> gef➤
>>>>
>>>> ----- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< ---
>>>>
>>>> I started to use and contribute clang static analyzer[2] just for finding the bugs for open source software from LLVM 3.x, perhaps it is a bug of LLVM 8, because jdk8u is just able to print out '-version' after compiled with llvm-3.9.1, I will rebuild the LLVM 8 again, then rebuild jdk8u for triple check.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Workaround-compile-with-llvm.patch https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xiangzhai/jdk8u-dev/master/Workaround-compile-with-llvm.patch
>>>>
>>>> 2. https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/a530e823ed2793ac149de7a984014e242a787682#diff-ff9160d4628cb9b6186559837c2c8668
>>>>
>>>> 3. The build option of LLVM 8 (bootstrap with LLVM 3.9.1):
>>>>
>>>> cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
>>>> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang \
>>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ \
>>>> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-fPIC" \
>>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11 -fPIC" \
>>>> -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_INSTALL_UTILS=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_FFI=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=ON \
>>>> -DLLVM_BUILD_DOCS=OFF \
>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_SPHINX=OFF \
>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_DOXYGEN=OFF \
>>>> -DLLDB_DISABLE_LIBEDIT=1 \
>>>> -DSPHINX_WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS=OFF \
>>>> -DFFI_INCLUDE_DIR=$(pkg-config --variable=includedir libffi) \
>>>> -DFFI_LIBRARY_DIR:PATH="$(pkg-config --variable=libdir libffi)" \
>>>> -DLLVM_BINUTILS_INCDIR=/usr/include \
>>>> -DLLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX=64 \
>>>> -DLIBCXX_ENABLE_ABI_LINKER_SCRIPT=ON \
>>>> -DLIBUNWIND_ENABLE_SHARED=ON \
>>>> -DLIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER=ON \
>>>> -DLLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER=clang \
>>>> -DLLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ \
>>>> -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE="x86_64-redhat-linux" \
>>>> -DCLANG_VENDOR="LLVM China"
>>>>
>>>> 4. $ clang -v
>>>> LLVM China clang version 8.0.0 (git at github.com:llvm-mirror/clang.git 81ef98628ebf5186d746c0986dcbf5073e842043) (git at github.com:llvm-mirror/llvm.git e1aac9723d55497e74d83d216329f08d9842e494) (based on LLVM 8.0.0svn)
>>>> Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
>>>> Thread model: posix
>>>> InstalledDir: /usr/bin
>>>> Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>> Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>> Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>> Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>> Selected GCC installation: /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>> Candidate multilib: .;@m64
>>>> Candidate multilib: 32;@m32
>>>> Selected multilib: .;@m64
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Leslie Zhai
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Leslie Zhai
>>
>>
--
Regards,
Leslie Zhai
More information about the build-dev
mailing list