AIX : -bnorwexec linker flag
Baesken, Matthias
matthias.baesken at sap.com
Mon Apr 15 14:47:18 UTC 2019
Hi Tony, agree the -bexpall is not good .
Do you have a good (/ better) solution for the issue , do you use visibility attributes in the C/C++ or export-lists ?
Maybe someone from IBM could comment on this too .
Best regards, Matthias
From: REIX, Tony <tony.reix at atos.net>
Sent: Montag, 15. April 2019 16:18
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; 'build-dev at openjdk.java.net' <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: AIX : -bnorwexec linker flag
Hi
Maybe that the patch is good, but the original code, though working fine, is bad.
--- a/make/autoconf/flags-ldflags.m4
- BASIC_LDFLAGS="-b64 -brtl -bnolibpath -bexpall -bernotok -btextpsize:64K \
On AIX, using -brtl and -bexpall is OK for fixing issues quick and dirty.
However, when building and delivering professional products, these options should be used only in last resort.
On AIX, the default is to NOT export all symbols. Instead, one should build the list of needed symbols and inform the linker with -bE and -bI linker options of the list of symbols that need to be exported/imported. That's more work, but it's the good way.
Using -bexpall means that all symbols contained in a library will be exported. Thus, an executable may want to load a symbol (like strcmp, which is first provided by the libc.a) from another library, breaking the upward compatibility. In addition, -bexpall creates performance issues. And also, sometimes, the linker explodes due to too many symbols.
As an example, the current versions of CMake and MariaDB for AIX make use of -bexpall (and, much worse, -expfull). We are changing the code of these 2 packages in order to no more use -bexpall (nor -bexpfull).
Regards,
Tony
More information about the build-dev
mailing list