RFR(S) [13] : 8226910 : make it possible to use jtreg's -match via run-test framework

[David Holmes]

Hi Igor,

This seems fine to me.

Thanks,
David

On 17/07/2019 7:35 am, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> can I get a review for this patch? 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8226910/webrev.01/index.html
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Igor
> 
>> On Jul 6, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Igor Ignatyev <igor.ignatyev at oracle.com 
>> <mailto:igor.ignatyev at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2019, at 1:58 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com 
>>> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Igor,
>>>
>>> On 6/07/2019 1:09 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>> ping?
>>>> -- Igor
>>>>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Igor Ignatyev 
>>>>> <igor.ignatyev at oracle.com <mailto:igor.ignatyev at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8226910/webrev.00/index.html
>>>>>> 25 lines changed: 18 ins; 3 del; 4 mod;
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> could you please review this small patch which adds 
>>>>> JTREG_RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS options to run-test framework? when 
>>>>> JTREG_RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS is set to true, jtreg will use problem 
>>>>> lists as values of -match: instead of -exclude, which effectively 
>>>>> means it will run only problem listed tests.
>>>
>>> doc/testing.md
>>>
>>> + Set to `true` of `false`.
>>>
>>> typo: s/of/or/
>> fixed .md, regenerated .html.
>>>
>>> Build changes seem okay - I can't attest to the operation of the flag.
>>
>> here is how I verified that it does that it supposed to:
>>
>> $ make test "JTREG=OPTIONS=-l;RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS=true" 
>> TEST=open/test/hotspot/jtreg/:hotspot_all
>> lists 53 tests, the same command w/o RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS (or w/ 
>> RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS=false) lists 6698 tests.
>>
>> $ make test 
>> "JTREG=OPTIONS=-l;RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS=true;EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=ProblemList-aot.txt
>> lists 81 tests, the same command w/o RUN_PROBLEM_LISTS lists 6670 tests.
>>
>>>
>>>>> doc/building.html got changed when I ran update-build-docs, I can 
>>>>> exclude it from the patch, but it seems it will keep changing every 
>>>>> time we run update-build-docs, so I decided to at least bring it up.
>>>
>>> Weird it seems to have removed line-breaks in that paragraph. What 
>>> platform did you build on?
>> I built on macos. now when I wrote that, I remember pandoc used to 
>> produce different results on macos. so I've rerun it on linux on the 
>> source w/o my change, and doc/building.html still got changed in the 
>> exact same way.
>>
>>> David
>>> -----
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JBS:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226910
>>>>> webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8226910/webrev.00/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -- Igor
>