[8u] [PING?] RFR: 8222737: [TESTBUG] Allow for tier 1 like testing in OpenJDK 8u

Andrew Dinn adinn at redhat.com
Mon Jul 29 09:19:29 UTC 2019


On 26/07/2019 18:32, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 26/07/2019 16:53, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 14:46 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 25/07/2019 16:02, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>
>>> snip...
>>>
>>>>> Done now. I've added fix-request comments/labels to the above bugs and
>>>>> rebased on top of them. New jdk changeset:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222737/04/jdk/webrev/
>>>>>
>>>>> Test groups definition is the JDK 9 set plus :jdk_jdi test set (part of
>>>>> JDK-8198551 in later JDKs). This seems a reasonable test set. Modulo
>>>>> added intrinsics testing only relevant for 9+, see JDK-8132855 and JDK-
>>>>> 8132854.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK to push?
>>>>
>>>> Any more thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Severin
>>>>
>>>
>>> This webrev lists three different bug IDs.
>>
>> It beats me why webrev lists other bugs. The other two, 8075573 and
>> 8075544, were clean backports and were pushed after jdk8u-fix-yes got
>> added.
>>
>>> What exactly is being pushed
>>> here?
>>
>> The following 4 patches:
>>
>> jdk:       http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222737/04/jdk/webrev/
>> hotspot:   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222737/03/hotspot/webrev/
>> langtools: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222737/03/langtools/webrev/
>> top:       http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222737/02/top/webrev/
>>
>> Each of them has a reference to a plain patch file if you prefer to
>> review that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Severin
>>
> 
> Ok. HotSpot, JDK & top look fine, but there seem to be a lot of changes
> in langtools. Are these original changes to this patch or are they
> backports? Is there a reason langtools needs so much more work than the
> others?
The langtools Makefile changes appear to be larger because they required
adding a load of definitions/macros that are already present in the
Makefiles in the other trees (i.e. AWK, CAT etc, ZIP_UP_RESULTS,
BUNDLE_UP_AND_EXIT etc). These changes look ok to me.

regards,


Andrew Dinn
-----------
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander


More information about the build-dev mailing list