RFR: 8233712: Limit default tests jobs based on ulimit -u setting

Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf at redhat.com
Fri Nov 8 13:08:05 UTC 2019


On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 11:26 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 09:58 +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> > On 2019-11-07 20:48, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > Hi Erik,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 10:01 -0800, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> > > > Hello Severin,
> > > > 
> > > > Taking ulimit -u into account does seem like a good idea. I don't see
> > > > why it needs to be limited to just aarch64 though. It should however be
> > > > limited to OSes that use ulimit (i.e. not windows).
> > > > 
> > > > I would suggest removing the arbitrary thresholds of 16 and 4096 and try
> > > > to come up with a plain number based on the ulimit value. You are saying
> > > > 14 is good for 4096, so the formula for the ULIMIT_DIVIDER is 4096 / 14,
> > > > which you can just write as:
> > > > 
> > > > ULIMIT_DIVIER := (4096 / 14)
> > > > 
> > > > And let the awk script calculate it if needed. In the awk script, you
> > > > need to put line 275 as conditional of the if statement on line 274.
> > > > Otherwise ULIMIT=-1 will cause concurrency -1.
> > > Thanks for the review! Updated webrev:
> > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8233712/02/webrev/
> > I know I'm coming here and making a simple patch more complicated, but 
> > I'm not entirely comfortable with the explicit call to ulimit. Our 
> > principle is that all executables that we call from the makefiles should 
> > be confirmed existing by configure, so the call should be "$(shell 
> > $(ULIMIT) -u)".
> > 
> > It should be relatively trivial to add this as a required prog in 
> > basics.m4 and spec.gmk.in. Make sure you only add it as required for 
> > non-Windows platforms. If you do this, you can change the check in the 
> > makefile to if $(ULIMIT) has a value, rather than checking on platform.
> 
> Here you go:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8233712/03/webrev/

Hmm, this failed jdk/submit. Could anybody provide me with some
details, please?

[Mach5] mach5-one-sgehwolf-JDK-8233712-3-20191108-1036-6526715: FAILED

Thanks,
Severin




More information about the build-dev mailing list