RFR 8233844: Add LogCompilation build artifacts to .gitignore

[Erik Joelsson]

This looks good, thanks!

/Erik

On 2019-11-08 09:48, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> Hello Erik,
>
> You are right, I spoke too soon. I deleted the artifacts and tried to 
> trigger the creation by doing a clean build and running some tests, 
> but neither seems to generate the artifacts. I'm really puzzled by 
> this, since I have 4 repos that contain these artifacts (both git and 
> hg), and I'm certain that I've never explicitly built this utility 
> using maven (I've never used it. I can imagine building it once and 
> not remembering, but not 4 times).
>
> Any way, here is the updated webrev: 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvernee/8233844/webrev.02
>
> I'll keep an eye out for these artifacts appearing again.
>
> Thanks,
> Jorn
>
> On 08/11/2019 15:16, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Hello Jorn,
>>
>> On 2019-11-08 04:24, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to contribute this very small patch that adds some 
>>> LogCompilation build artifacts to the .gitignore file.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233844
>>> Webrev: 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvernee/8233844/webrev.00/index.html
>>>
>>> Testing = manual
>>>
>>> FWIW, it seems that these artifacts are produced at some point 
>>> either while doing a vanilla build, or when running the test, so 
>>> these artifacts will show up pretty much always when using Git 
>>> (AFAICS I have them in all my OpenJDK Git repos, and I've never 
>>> directly used this utility). So, it seems worth it to gitnore them.
>>>
>> I've never seen these artifacts, and the only way I can see them 
>> being created is if you explicitly invoke the maven build for 
>> LogCompilation (which of course is a perfectly valid thing to do). 
>> The .classpath, .project and .settings files are eclipse project 
>> files and it could be argued that those should be put on ignore 
>> regardless of where in the source tree they are found, just like we 
>> already do for .idea. When adding this for .gitignore, I would prefer 
>> if we could keep parity with .hgignore so please add it there too.
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>>> As a heads-up; I'm not a committer on the JDK project, so a sponsor 
>>> would need to push this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jorn
>>>