RFR: JEP 367: Remove the Pack200 Tools and API

Vicente Romero vicente.romero at oracle.com
Fri Nov 22 21:30:42 UTC 2019


Hi all,

On 11/22/19 3:21 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> On 21/11/2019 19:53, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I have covered all the proposed fixes so far. This is the 
>> last iteration of the webrev [1], all the current changes are in this 
>> one, the code hasn't been split into different webrevs. I'm also 
>> forwarding to build-dev as there are some build related changes too. 
>> The CSR for this change is at [2]
> Would it be possible to summarize what will remain in 
> test/jdk/tools/pack200 after this removal? The webrev makes it looks 
> like badattr.jar is being added but since it already exists then I'm 
> not sure whether to believe it. pack200-verifier/data/golden.jar is 
> another one as it looks like JAR file that is generated by the tests 
> today is being checked in, maybe `hg add` in error?

I don't know why it is shown as added in the webrev, they have been 
removed. I have published another iteration of the webrev at [1]
>
> The change to flags-cflag.m4 to add LP64=1 on Windows will need eyes, 
> it's not immediately obvious to me which shared code compiled on 
> Windows is impacted by this.

yes probably this change is risky. I did it as the comment suggested 
that the only reason the treatment for Windows was different was because 
of pack200. But not sure if we can trust that comment. Should I restore 
this code to its original state?
>
> -Alan


Thanks,
Vicente

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8234542/webrev.03/



More information about the build-dev mailing list