configuring with --with-jvm-variants=minimal,server makes cds disappear in server
Erik Joelsson
erik.joelsson at oracle.com
Thu Jan 16 17:09:30 UTC 2020
I would lean towards changing the check from "if any of the variants do
not support CDS, disable it" to "if any of the variants support CDS,
enable it". The cds jvm feature is only added to the variants that
support it anyway.
If you do this, you probably need to figure out how to explicitly only
generate the archive for the supported jvm variants in Images.gmk too.
Not sure if the archive is jvm variant dependent or if the layout even
supports multiple variants. It will likely get messy.
/Erik
On 2020-01-16 08:22, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> Hello, thanks for looking into it .
> Should I do a check just looking into single JVM configs, something like
>
> AC_DEFUN([HOTSPOT_IS_JVM_VARIANT],
> [ [ [[ " $JVM_VARIANTS " == " $1 " ]] ] ])
>
> if HOTSPOT_IS_JVM_VARIANT(zero) || HOTSPOT_IS_JVM_VARIANT(minimal) || HOTSPOT_IS_JVM_VARIANT(core); then
>
> instead of
>
> AC_DEFUN([HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT],
> [ [ [[ " $JVM_VARIANTS " =~ " $1 " ]] ] ])
>
> if HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(zero) || HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(minimal) || HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(core); then
>
>
> This should remove the error in case of multi-JVM configs .
> Or maybe the whole check ( if HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(zero) || HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(minimal) || HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(core); then .... fi )
> might be removed , I see not so much value in it because in case one sets --enable-jvm-features directly the check isn’t done .
>
> I opened bug :
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237374
>
> JDK-8237374 : configuring with --with-jvm-variants=minimal,server makes cds disappear in server
>
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
>
>
>
>> This does indeed look like a bug to me. At least at Oracle, we no longer
>> build any multi JVM configs regularly, so things like this falls through
>> the cracks.
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> On 2020-01-16 02:18, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
>>> Hello, I noticed the following strange "feature" (or is it a bug?) .
>>> When building 2 VM variants in one build and using
>>>
>>> --with-jvm-variants=minimal,server
>>>
>>> For this, the build works nicely. But I notice that in the server VM, cds is
>> removed.
>>> Instead of
>>>
>>> checking if cds should be enabled... yes
>>>
>>> I get ( with the following patch that adds tracing) :
>>>
>>> configure: WARNING: ENABLE_CDS set to false because we found a
>> minimal, core or zero JVM.
>>> checking if cds should be enabled... no
>>> ...
>>>
>>> * JVM features: minimal: 'compiler1 minimal serialgc' server: 'compiler1
>> compiler2 epsilongc g1gc jfr jni-check jvmti management nmt parallelgc
>> serialgc services vm-structs'
>>> (patch is
>>>
>>> --- a/make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 Wed Jan 15 21:20:40 2020 -0800
>>> +++ b/make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 Thu Jan 16 10:24:43 2020 +0100
>>> @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@
>>> if HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(zero) ||
>> HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(minimal) ||
>> HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_VARIANT(core); then
>>> # ..except when the user explicitely requested it with --enable-jvm-
>> features
>>> if ! HOTSPOT_CHECK_JVM_FEATURE(cds); then
>>> ENABLE_CDS="false"
>>> + AC_MSG_WARN([ENABLE_CDS set to false because we found a
>> minimal, core or zero JVM.])
>>> if test "x$enable_cds" = "xyes"; then
>>> AC_MSG_ERROR([CDS not implemented for variants zero, minimal,
>> core. Remove --enable-cds.])
>>> Fi
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it expected that cds goes away in "server" when configuring "--with-
>> jvm-variants=minimal,server" ? Looks like a bug to me, should it be fixed
>> (so that cds stays in the server jvm-feature list) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Matthias
>>>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list