RFR: 8237192: Generate stripped/public pdbs on Windows for jdk images

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Jan 17 22:25:16 UTC 2020


Hi Matthias,

This also needs to be a configurable option not one done by default as 
there can be non-technical issues relating to shipping symbol files in a 
product.

Thanks,
David

On 17/01/2020 6:44 pm, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> Hello, please review this change related to stripped/"public" pdb file generation on Windows .
> 
> Currently the JDK bundle on Windows does not contain pdb files (full pdb files are in a separate symbols bundle).
> This leads currently to bad native stack traces e.g. when crashes occur.
> One reason not to deliver the full pdb files might be the large size of these files.
> 
> However there exist also "public" or stripped pdb files on Windows, see :
> 
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/pdbstripped-strip-private-symbols?view=vs-2017
> 
> Those are much smaller (often only 10-20% of the full pdb files) and they offer a good compromise (no "file:linenumber" info in the native stacks but at least the function name+hex-offset is visible)
> to delivering full pdbs in the JDK.
> 
> Example sizes for the currently built full pdbs / stripped pdbs from VS2017 based 64bit build of jdk/jdk :
> jvm.pdb : 73,1 MB / 9,46 MB
> awt.pdb : 7,05 MB / 1,48 MB
> 
> The patch  adds  generation  of stripped  pdb files  to the Windows  build.
> Additionally those files are put into the JDK  bundle    (while the symbols bundle still gets the full pdb files ) .
> 
> 
> Bug/webrev :
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237192
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8237192.0/
> 
> 
> Thanks, Matthias
> 



More information about the build-dev mailing list