RFC: 8229469 JEP 386: Alpine Linux/x64 Port

Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Tue Sep 1 13:21:30 UTC 2020


On 2020-09-01 13:41, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> JEP 386 is now Candidate [1] and as we resolved all outstanding issues
> within the Portola project I'd like to ask for comments from HotSpot,
> Core Libs (changes in libjli/java_md.c), and Build groups before moving
> the JEP to Proposed to Target:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avoitylov/webrev.8247589.01/
Looks good to me.

/Magnus
>
> Testing:
>
> JTReg, VM TestBase on all platforms (Linux x86_64, Linux x86, Linux Arm,
> Linux AArch64, Linux PPC, Windows x86_64, Windows x86, Mac) with no
> regressions. A downport of these changes to 14 passes JCK 14 on these
> platforms.
>
> The port was tested on Alpine Linux 3.8 and 3.11 with JTReg, VM
> TestBase. There are no differences with Linux x86_64  with the exception
> of SA which is not supported as per the JEP. A downport of these changes
> to 14 passes JCK 14 on Alpine Linux.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Aleksei
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229469
>
>




More information about the build-dev mailing list