RFR: 8248238: Implementation of JEP: Windows AArch64 Support [v5]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.java.net
Thu Sep 24 05:00:16 UTC 2020
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:23:43 GMT, Monica Beckwith <mbeckwit at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is a continuation of https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch64-port-dev/2020-August/009566.html
>>
>> Changes since then:
>> * We've improved the write barrier as suggested by Andrew [1]
>> * The define-guards around R18 have been changed to `R18_RESERVED`. This will be enabled for Windows only for now but
>> will be required for the upcoming macOS+Aarch64 [2] port as well.
>> * We've incorporated https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/154 by @AntonKozlov in our PR for now and built the
>> Windows-specific CPU feature detection on top of it.
>>
>> [1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch64-port-dev/2020-August/009597.html
>> [2] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8251280
>
> Monica Beckwith has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Update orderAccess_windows_aarch64.hpp
>
> changing from Acq-reL to Sequential Consistency to avoid compiler reordering when no ordering hints are provided
I've mainly looked at the non-Aarch64 specific changes. A couple of minor comments below.
src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 2546:
> 2544:
> 2545: #ifdef _M_ARM64
> 2546: // Unsafe memory access
I'm not at all clear why this unsafe memory access handling is for Aarch64 only?
src/hotspot/share/runtime/stubRoutines.cpp line 397:
> 395: // test safefetch routines
> 396: // Not on Windows 32bit until 8074860 is fixed
> 397: #if ! (defined(_WIN32) && defined(_M_IX86)) && !defined(_M_ARM64)
The comment needs updating to refer to Aarch64.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/212
More information about the build-dev
mailing list