GHAs and precompiled headers
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Mon Jan 24 09:31:41 UTC 2022
On 1/24/22 10:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:15 AM Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com <mailto:shade at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 1/24/22 8:43 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> > We generally build without --disable-precompiled-headers in GHAs, which
> > hides errors from missing includes. Since GHAs are very useful to test
> > builds on side platforms, would it not make sense to build without
> > precompiled headers? Or is that too costly?
>
> But... We *do* build Hotspot without PCH in "additional" configurations that test different
> platforms:
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/9bf6ffa19f1ea9efcadb3396d921305c9ec0b1d1/.github/workflows/submit.yml#L408-L432
> <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/9bf6ffa19f1ea9efcadb3396d921305c9ec0b1d1/.github/workflows/submit.yml#L408-L432>
>
> Yes, but only Linux. Leaves out macOS and Windows. For people who mainly use Linux and rely on GHA
Ah.
The last I checked, dropping PCH on Windows made build times suffer a lot. Given how underpowered
are the Windows and MacOS build nodes in GHA, I'd rather accept a small possibility of non-PCH
breakage than slowness of generic GHA workflows.
--
Thanks,
-Aleksey
More information about the build-dev
mailing list