RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API

Mon Nov 7 12:56:30 UTC 2022

On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:45:00 GMT, Adam Sotona <asotona at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> make/test/BuildMicrobenchmark.gmk line 106:
>> 
>>> 104:         --add-exports java.base/jdk.classfile.components=ALL-UNNAMED \
>>> 105:         --add-exports java.base/jdk.classfile.impl=ALL-UNNAMED \
>>> 106:         --add-exports java.base/jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm=ALL-UNNAMED \
>> 
>> Why do you need to export ASM now, when it was not needed before? I thought the purpose here was to replace ASM..?
>
> There are new benchmarks added, comparing performance of Classfile API with ASM.

I see.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10982