RFR: 8307160: [REDO] Enable the permissive- flag on the Microsoft Visual C compiler [v2]
Julian Waters
jwaters at openjdk.org
Wed Aug 9 04:02:43 UTC 2023
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 19:56:24 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stuefe at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Julian Waters has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 22 additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Mismatched declaration in D3DGlyphCache.cpp
>> - Fields in awt_TextComponent.cpp
>> - reinterpret_cast needed in AccessBridgeJavaEntryPoints.cpp
>> - Qualifiers in awt_PrintDialog.h should be removed
>> - Likewise for awt_DnDDT.cpp
>> - awt_ole.h include order issue in awt_DnDDS.cpp
>> - Revert awt_ole.h
>> - Earlier fix in awt_ole.h was not complete
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into patch-10
>> - Likewise for awt_Frame.cpp
>> - ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/9da8c164...51230f3d
>
> src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 2888:
>
>> 2886: LONG WINAPI topLevelUnhandledExceptionFilter(struct _EXCEPTION_POINTERS* exceptionInfo) {
>> 2887: if (!InterceptOSException) {
>> 2888: DWORD exception_code = exceptionInfo->ExceptionRecord->ExceptionCode;
>
> I find this less clearer than the original code, that didn't use negation - it was clear that InterceptOSException leads to immediate bailout.
>
> What is the problem, the goto? is the compiler complaining? If so, I would vote for duplicating the return statement here (and this would count as an example where discarding out-of-fashion statements like goto actually makes the code worse).
Hi Thomas, the goto jumps over a lot of variable initializations, which permissive- doesn't particularly like (the failing compilation can actually be seen in the earlier GHA logs)
> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_DnDDS.cpp line 48:
>
>> 46:
>> 47: #include "jlong.h"
>> 48: #include "awt.h"
>
> Why the reordering of includes?
This is a weird one, but in awt we #define malloc Do_Not_Use_Malloc... And so on. Without this reordering awt_ole.h (which includes comdef.h) also uses the redefined malloc somewhere (I could not find where in comip.h that it's used) which breaks compilation. I do find it strange that without permissive- it doesn't break though. Same applies to the other reordering of includes
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15096#discussion_r1287904601
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15096#discussion_r1287903377
More information about the build-dev
mailing list