building individual test issue

[Vladimir Petko]

Hi,

Yes, patches from debian/patches. They can be applied with quilt[1]
and only patches listed in series are needed.

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

[1] https://linux.die.net/man/1/quilt

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 1:19 AM Mykhaylo Lodygin
<mlodygin at cloudlinux.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Vladimir, thank you for your attention,
> did you mean set of patches located in debian/patches ? those are patched (all in the series file) or some other?
> Mykhaylo
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:11 PM Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  I believe this was due to building OpenJDK from Debian original
>> tarball that does not contain bundled libraries. Building from it
>> requires applying Debian patches via `quilt push -a` and using
>> configure arguments from `debian/rules`.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>  Vladimir.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 1:02 AM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 28/08/2023 9:54 pm, Mykhaylo Lodygin wrote:
>> > > Hello colleagues,
>> > > I've build JDK locally successfully, but got several tests "FAILED".
>> >
>> > What did you build? images? what about test-images?
>> >
>> > > Tried to run one of the failing test separately with "make test
>> > > TEST="<path_to_test>".
>> > > Were unable to do so due to build error - the compiler was unfamiliar to
>> > > include path to winscard.h, fixed with configuration option:
>> > > bash configure --with-extra-cflags="-I/usr/include/PCSC"
>> >
>> > What test(s), on what platform?
>> >
>> > > next error was incapability of  linker to link with libjpeg - fixed with
>> > > adding --with-libjpeg=system to configure.
>> > > the issue was solved,  but a new one was added with missing libgif.
>> > > I was curious and tried a test that "Passed", thinking that "failure"
>> > > could had happen due to inability to build the test. Tried
>> > > sun/util/calendar/zi/Beyond2037.java but got a very similar error of
>> > > inability to link with liblcms2-2.
>> > > I'm flabbergasted, hence my questions are: does "make test" target is
>> > > expected to rebuild JDK's code? does my approach of adding options to
>> > > configure script is proper one? How come a test could be "Passed" while
>> > > running it separately results in inability to build the test?
>> >
>> > As Erik indicated we need more information/details.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > David
>> >
>> >
>> > > Thank you.
>> > > Mykhaylo Lodygin