RFR: JDK-8298445: Add LeakSanitizer support in HotSpot [v6]

[Justin King]

On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 06:45:28 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stuefe at openjdk.org> wrote:

> The informal rule is that ongoing discussions should be closed and that nobody strongly objects to a change. Two reviewers are easy to come by. The point of this rule is that you have a reasonable chance to block changes you strongly oppose. And that every change in the code base has the buy-in from the majority.
> 
> Note that a patch is seldom blocked by one person alone for a prolonged amount of time. But sometimes, overworked reviewers may block-then-ghost without meaning to. Requires patience from authors and responsibility from reviewers. As an author, it is okay to ping after a while and, getting no answer, to integrate with a clear warning.
> 
> This all requires more time than faster paced projects, which is accepted for most RFEs. Requires more discussion and convincing, but gives us a better community. Still faster than getting in kernel patches :)

Okay, fair. I will keep all this in mind. Thank you! Let's continue the discussion, will respond in a second.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12229