RFR: 8015831: Add lint check for calling overridable methods from a constructor [v7]
Archie L. Cobbs
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Jan 12 21:07:28 UTC 2023
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 18:48:25 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I guess what I'm thinking about:
>>
>> No leak is possible in that example.
>> * `new Foo()` creates an instance of `Foo` (not a subclass of `Foo`) therefore `m()` is not overridden
>> * Any subclass of `Foo` that may exist in the outside world cannot use the `Foo()` constructor that leaks because it's private
>
> but what if `m` is a static method in a separate compilation unit? Should it be able to observe a partially initialized Foo?
Caring about the proper initialization of any class in the _current_ compilation unit is an explicit non-goal.
We only care about bugs where a superclass and subclass are in separate compilation units.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11874
More information about the build-dev
mailing list