RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v24]

[Severin Gehwolf]

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:56:02 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <ihse at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I was not aware of such a convention and I can't say I agree with it. It just seems redundant and unnecessary, but I suppose we should wait for Magnus to respond.
>
> Just to clarify: I did not say the name needed to be long, just that many (if not all) tools has used the convention of using the package name `build.tools.<toolname>` and the class name `<ToolName>.java`. 
> 
> I think the new name sounds 👍 .

Thanks. Yes, the long name was my doing. Sorry.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#discussion_r1553173105