[External] : RE: jdk21u-dev build issue : 8326332: Unclosed inline tags cause misalignment in summary tables

[Erik Joelsson]

Something like that yes. Maybe just BOOT_JDK_RELEASE, or possibly 
BOOT_JDK_RELEASE_FLAG?

/Erik

On 8/12/24 5:56 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
>
> You mean instead of BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET   use 
> BOOT_JDK_RELEASETARGET   (and set '--release N-1'  there)  ?
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
> *From:*Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, 12 August 2024 14:30
> *To:* Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; Magnus Ihse Bursie 
> <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>; build-dev at openjdk.org
> *Subject:* Re: [External] : RE: jdk21u-dev build issue : 8326332: 
> Unclosed inline tags cause misalignment in summary tables
>
> There is a variable BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET exported from configure and 
> picked up in JavaCompilation.gmk. We should probably change the name 
> of the variable as well to avoid confusion.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 8/12/24 12:08 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
>
>     Hi Erik, the '--release N-1'   sounds like a good idea ; where do
>     we have to set it ?
>
>     Best regards, Matthias
>
>     >To me that sounds like GHA are miss-configured for the update
>     releases. To work around this, perhaps we should set an explicit
>     '--release N-1' argument when building source intended to run on
>     the bootjdk. It looks like we currently set '-source N-1 -target
>     N-1' but that isn't enough as it won't change the available JDK
>     APIs to link to.
>
>     >/Erik
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20240812/bb60eed1/attachment-0001.htm>