RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]

Alan Bateman alanb at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 3 19:12:43 UTC 2024


On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:40:10 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Does that proposal sound good?

That table is useful, I think it's right. No change to default behavior. If someone configures with --enable-runtime-image then they get a JDK run-time image that supports jlink (with some limitations) but is significantly small as it doesn't include the packaged modules.

I've read through most of the changes now. Overall I think it's looking good, just a few terminology and minor points that I'll add as comments.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2145932080


More information about the build-dev mailing list