RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 3 19:12:43 UTC 2024
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:40:10 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Does that proposal sound good?
That table is useful, I think it's right. No change to default behavior. If someone configures with --enable-runtime-image then they get a JDK run-time image that supports jlink (with some limitations) but is significantly small as it doesn't include the packaged modules.
I've read through most of the changes now. Overall I think it's looking good, just a few terminology and minor points that I'll add as comments.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2145932080
More information about the build-dev
mailing list