RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v30]
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Wed Jun 5 13:37:15 UTC 2024
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:23:19 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink. Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK install might not come with the packaged modules (directory `jmods`). This is particularly useful to further reduce the size of a jlinked runtime. After the removal of the concept of a JRE, a common distribution mechanism is still the full JDK with all modules and packaged modules. However, packaged modules can incur an additional size tax. For example in a container scenario it could be useful to have a base JDK container including all modules, but without also delivering the packaged modules. This comes at a size advantage of `~25%`. Such a base JDK container could then be used to `jlink` application specific runtimes, further reducing the size of the application runtime image (App + JDK runtime; as a single image *or* separate bundles, depending on the app
being modularized).
>>
>> The basic design of this approach is to add a jlink plugin for tracking non-class and non-resource files of a JDK install. I.e. files which aren't present in the jimage (`lib/modules`). This enables producing a `JRTArchive` class which has all the info of what constitutes the final jlinked runtime.
>>
>> Basic usage example:
>>
>> $ diff -u <(./bin/java --list-modules --limit-modules java.se) <(../linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java --list-modules --limit-modules java.se)
>> $ diff -u <(./bin/java --list-modules --limit-modules jdk.jlink) <(../linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java --list-modules --limit-modules jdk.jlink)
>> $ ls ../linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/jmods
>> java.base.jmod java.net.http.jmod java.sql.rowset.jmod jdk.crypto.ec.jmod jdk.internal.opt.jmod jdk.jdi.jmod jdk.management.agent.jmod jdk.security.auth.jmod
>> java.compiler.jmod java.prefs.jmod java.transaction.xa.jmod jdk.dynalink.jmod jdk.internal.vm.ci.jmod jdk.jdwp.agent.jmod jdk.management.jfr.jmod jdk.security.jgss.jmod
>> java.datatransfer.jmod java.rmi.jmod java.xml.crypto.jmod jdk.editpad.jmod jdk.internal.vm.compiler.jmod jdk.jfr.jmod jdk.management.jmod jdk.unsupported.desktop.jmod
>> java.desktop.jmod java.scripting.jmod java.xml.jmod jdk.hotspot.agent.jmod jdk.i...
>
> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 113 commits:
>
> - Mark some tests with requiring packaged modules
> - Correctly set packaged modules default
> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
> - Fix new line in jlink.properties
> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
> - Simplify JLINK_JDK_EXTRA_OPTS var handling
> - Only add runtime track files for linkable runtimes
> - Generate the runtime image link diff at jlink time
>
> But only do that once the plugin-pipeline has run. The generation is
> enabled with the hidden option '--generate-linkable-runtime' and
> the resource pools available at jlink time are being used to generate
> the diff.
> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
> - ... and 103 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/64bbae75...0eb1e48d
src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/JRTArchive.java line 131:
> 129: public boolean equals(Object obj) {
> 130: if (obj instanceof JRTArchive) {
> 131: JRTArchive other = (JRTArchive)obj;
Cleanup for later, you can use pattern matching here and avoid the cast.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#discussion_r1627798949
More information about the build-dev
mailing list