RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]

[Severin Gehwolf]

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:04:30 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <ihse at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> Does that proposal sound good?
>> 
>> That table is useful, I think it's right. No change to default behavior. If someone configures with --enable-runtime-image then they get a JDK run-time image that supports jlink (with some limitations) but is significantly small as it doesn't include the packaged modules.
>> 
>> I've read through most of the changes now. Overall I think it's looking good, just a few terminology and minor points that I'll add as comments.
>
>> Does that proposal sound good?
> 
> What you basically is saying is that the default value of `packaged-modules` should be `! runtime-link-image` (i.e. the inverse)?

@magicus @erikj79 Do you mind re-reviewing the build changes?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2150590534