RFR: 8331553: Windows JVM leaks Event and Thread handles when multiple threads are used [v2]

Daniel Jeliński djelinski at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 24 07:25:15 UTC 2024


On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:50:22 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelinski at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> We use 2 ParkEvent instances per thread. The ParkEvent objects are never freed, but they are recycled when a thread dies, so the number of live ParkEvent instances is proportional to the maximum number of threads that were live at any time.
>> 
>> On Windows, the ParkEvent object wraps a kernel Event object. Kernel objects are a limited and costly resource. In this PR, I replace the use of kernel events with user-space synchronization.
>> 
>> The new implementation uses WaitOnAddress and WakeByAddressSingle methods to implement synchronization. The methods are available since Windows 8. We only support Windows 10 and newer, so OS support should not be a problem.
>> 
>> WaitOnAddress was observed to return spuriously, so I added the necessary code to recalculate the timeout and continue waiting.
>> 
>> Tier1-5 tests passed. Performance tests were... inconclusive. For example, `ThreadOnSpinWaitProducerConsumer` reported 30% better results, while `LockUnlock.testContendedLock` results were 50% worse. 
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>
> Daniel Jeliński has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update comment

Yes, that test. It failed with a timeout in 3 out of 3 runs. The test is doing producer/consumer with Object.wait/notifyAll, so it's most likely related.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19778#issuecomment-2185791614


More information about the build-dev mailing list