[External] : RE: JDK-8170635
erik.joelsson at oracle.com
erik.joelsson at oracle.com
Tue May 7 12:41:49 UTC 2024
On 5/7/24 01:04, Suchismith Roy wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas
> Thank you for the reply. I want to reach out to Erik who was working
> on this issue.
> @erik.joelsson at oracle.com <mailto:erik.joelsson at oracle.com> Do you
> also propose the same solution as mentioned by Thomas ?
>
This is an almost 8 year old email thread, so I definitely do not
remember this discussion. From what I can see I only responded to
Volker's counter proposal and added some details on how to solve it that
way, and giving it my blessing as a concept. As I'm not affected by how
this is solved, I don't have a strong opinion on how to do it, but if I
was, I would certainly prefer Volker's solution, with the code still in
the JDK repository, to having to deal with a new 3rd party dependency.
/Erik
> I haven’t worked with resolving build dependencies before, so could I
> get some guidance on this. May be some old issue that got closed and I
> can refer the code ?
>
> Thanks
> Suchismith Roy
>
> *From: *Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 6 May 2024 at 8:06 PM
> *To: *Suchismith Roy <Suchismith.Roy at ibm.com>
> *Cc: *build-dev at openjdk.org <build-dev at openjdk.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: JDK-8170635
>
> Not sure if you meant to address this mail to a specific person. I
> assume with proposal you mean this:
> https: //mail. openjdk. org/pipermail/build-dev/2016-September/017746. html
> ? If yes, my proposal was to move dladdr out of the OpenJDK code
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>
> *This Message Is From an External Sender *
>
> This message came from outside your organization.
>
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/AdhS1Rd-!-XFVHHgR-sf3XPsVA-Qo8SSgcNtMyocpuj5fYT352LQQZk5m_XczZ4-c911VUojTFZMdjNBF4AYSkko96HYujg7Vmxw_jYyJtippfk-lZ6TGV7GCKgNj-E4Bm8o6mA$>
>
> Report Suspicious<https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/AdhS1Rd-!-XFVHHgR-sf3XPsVA-Qo8SSgcNtMyocpuj5fYT352LQQZk5m_XczZ4-c911VUojTFZMdjNBF4AYSkko96HYujg7Vmxw_jYyJtippfk-lZ6TGV7GCKgNj-E4Bm8o6mA$>
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> Not sure if you meant to address this mail to a specific person. I
> assume with proposal you mean this:
> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2016-September/017746.html ?
>
> If yes, my proposal was to move dladdr out of the OpenJDK code base
> into an independent library that would be maintained by IBM,
> hopefully, and would be a prerequisite for building the JDK.
>
> If no, whose proposal did you mean?
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 11:58 AM Suchismith Roy
> <Suchismith.Roy at ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I wanted to discuss regarding
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8170635
> <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8170635>.
> Do you have any pointers on moving dladdr() for AIX according to
> the current JDK23 structure.
> I think you had suggested one proposition according to JDK11 ?
> Could we get some more pointers on this proposition ?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20240507/78a6ac82/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list