RFR: 8352506: Simplify make/test/JtregNativeHotspot.gmk

[David Holmes]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 22:40:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <ihse at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> make/test/JtregNativeHotspot.gmk line 121:
>> 
>>> 119:     -I$(VM_TESTBASE_DIR)/nsk/stress/jni \
>>> 120:     -I$(VM_TESTBASE_DIR)/vm/mlvm/share \
>>> 121:     -I$(VM_TESTBASE_DIR)/vm/share \
>> 
>> Including these directories for every native test seems a little risky. Are we sure there are no header files with the same name? Can we not still add these only if the test needs them e.g. if it has vmTestBase in its name for the nsk tests?
>
> I don't know if it is "risky". Compare this with how all hotspot files are compiled, with all these include directories:
> 
> build/macosx-aarch64/hotspot/variant-server/gensrc
> build/macosx-aarch64/hotspot/variant-server/gensrc/adfiles
> build/macosx-aarch64/support/modules_include/java.base
> build/macosx-aarch64/support/modules_include/java.base/darwin
> open/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64
> open/src/hotspot/os_cpu/bsd_aarch64
> open/src/hotspot/os/bsd
> open/src/hotspot/os/posix
> open/src/hotspot/os/posix/include
> open/src/hotspot/share
> open/src/hotspot/share/include
> open/src/java.base/share/native/include
> open/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage
> open/src/java.base/unix/native/include
> 
> 
> Are we sure that there are no header files of the same name here? We can check, and there are none. Can we be sure that no one will add a conflicting header? Well, yes, since then the product would not compile as expected. 
> 
> Going back to the test files. This is the complete list of all header files present in these directories:
> 
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/aod/aod.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jni/ExceptionCheckingJniEnv.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jni/jni_tools.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/agent_common/agent_common.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/aod/jvmti_aod.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/Injector.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/jvmti_FollowRefObjects.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/jvmti_tools.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jvmti/JVMTITools.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/native/native_thread.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/native/nsk_list.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/native/nsk_mutex.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/native/nsk_tools.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/stress/jni/jnihelper.hpp
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/vm/mlvm/share/mlvmJvmtiUtils.hpp
> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/jvmti/jvmti_common.hpp
> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/jvmti/jvmti_thread.hpp
> 
> 
> As you can see, there are no conflicts.
> 
> Most of the names are very specific and include some part of their specific "package" in the name. It seems highly unlikely to me that someone would add another header file with the same name as any of these. 
> 
> And, also, if someone were to do that after this PR, the tests would fail to compile as expected, so it can't really happen by mistake.
> 
> (I do note the weird fact that there is both a `jvmti_tools.hpp` a...

Okay, lets give it a try.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24130#discussion_r2006936847