<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    I'm OK with this.<br>
    <br>
    -- Jon<br>
    <br>
    On 04/05/2012 01:51 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:4F7D5D2A.1040907@oracle.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-langtools-new.03/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-langtools-new.03/</a><br>
      <br>
      Addressed the comments below. <br>
      <br>
      Leaving GenStubs functionality active, but with just one class,
      for demo purposes and to keep exercising the functionality for
      now. At a later stage we should make it optional.<br>
      <br>
      For our compare script to keep reporting success, I will leave the
      javax.tools.JavaCompilerTool in there, with the explaining
      comment.<br>
      <br>
      If this looks ok, we have had the reviews out for a week and no
      other major concerns or protests. Does that mean Kelly could start
      pushing this into the build forest later today?<br>
      <br>
      /Erik<br>
      <br>
      On 2012-04-04 16:56, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
      <blockquote cite="mid:4F7C610E.7010104@oracle.com" type="cite">
        <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
          http-equiv="Content-Type">
        In langtools/Makefile, <br>
        <br>
        line 42, bad/inappropriate/editorial comment:<br>
        "A more palatable solution would be to add the GenStubs
        functionality to javac."<br>
        It would be totally unacceptable to add GenStubs to javac, so
        the comment is irrelevant.<br>
        <br>
        line 120, 130-138, the nio files are not required when building
        on JDK 7.<br>
        <br>
        line 179, what is "javax.tools.JavaCompilerTool" and why is it
        listed as in RESOURCE_SUFFIXES<br>
        line 194, is the JARMAIN required? It should not be used
        downstream, so does it need to be set here?<br>
        <br>
        -- Jon<br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        On 04/04/2012 07:41 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
        <blockquote cite="mid:4F7C5DAA.6070107@oracle.com" type="cite">
          <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          One final review update. Cleanup of configure help output and
          make help target in root repo.<br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-root-new.03/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-root-new.03/</a><br>
          <br>
          /Erik<br>
          <br>
          On 2012-04-03 11:59, Erik Joelsson wrote:
          <blockquote cite="mid:4F7ACA02.1040302@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
              http-equiv="Content-Type">
            Fixed these comments and posted new webrevs:<br>
            <br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-corba-new.02/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-corba-new.02/</a><br>
            <br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eerikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-langtools-new.02/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/build-infra-m1/webrev-langtools-new.02/</a><br>
            <br>
            (Tried making a single webrev but my forest extension isn't
            working that well)<br>
            <br>
            /Erik<br>
            <br>
            On 2012-03-30 20:08, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
            <blockquote
              cite="mid:2D3C0F04-2D20-4B55-8B1B-4210C9F5EFE2@oracle.com"
              type="cite">
              <pre>Corba Makefile says:  45 # Thus we force the target bytecode to 6.</pre>
              <div>But I think 6 should be 7, or better yet <span
                  class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
                  monospace; white-space: pre;"> </span><span
                  class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
                  monospace; white-space: pre;">"...the<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  boot<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  jdk target bytecode."</span></div>
              <div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
                  monospace; white-space: pre;"><br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                </span></div>
              <div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
                  monospace; white-space: pre;">Everything else looks ok<br>
                  to<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  me.</span></div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>-kto</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            On 2012-03-30 15:19, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
            <blockquote cite="mid:4F75B2C6.7090004@oracle.com"
              type="cite"> langtools makefile...<br>
              <br>
              line 55 typo in comment "ony"<br>
              <br>
              line 57 grammar in comment "list of to be created"<br>
              <br>
              The Swedish examples are somewhat silly since there are no
              swedish properties files.<br>
              <br>
              The comments on line 92--94 are inaccurate: javac is only
              build twice, not three times.<br>
              <br>
              line 130: grammar, should be either "strip them of all
              content" or "strip all content from them"<br>
              <br>
              line 168: not clear what "this setup" refers to.<br>
              <br>
              -- Jon</blockquote>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>