Why Two versions of FILES_java.gmk ?

[Erik Joelsson]

The new build system holds a copy of the old to piggy back on while the 
conversion was happening. We are about to push an update to the new 
build system where all these copied files are removed. You do not need 
to update the makefiles-version of the file as it will be removed very soon.

In the new build system, there is no need to list files like this.

/Erik

On 2012-07-03 10:42, Jim Gish wrote:
> Thanks, Mike.
>
> Shall I sync them up since I'm changing them anyway at the moment?
>
> Jim
>
> On 07/03/2012 01:38 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>> One is used by the old build system (make) and the other is used by 
>> the new build infrastructure (makefiles). It's unfortunate that they 
>> are out of sync. As you have guessed they should not be. I'm hoping 
>> that the new build infra can eventually get rid of the need for silly 
>> listing files.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Jul 3 2012, at 09:54 , Jim Gish wrote:
>>
>>> I'm adding new java files into make/java/java/FILES_java.gmk.  Why 
>>> is there also makefiles/java/java/FILES_java.gmk ?  Do they serve 
>>> different purposes?  They are not in sync.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304
>>> Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team
>>> 35 Network Drive
>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>> jim.gish at oracle.com
>>>
>