From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Tue Jun 4 14:02:58 2013 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:02:58 -0700 Subject: RFE: bootcycle-images Message-ID: <51AE5602.6030801@oracle.com> It is somewhat inelgant and confusing that when I do "make bootcycle-images" the build log ends with: > ## Finished images (build time 00:00:13) > > ----- Build times ------- > Start 2013-06-04 13:10:27 > End 2013-06-04 13:14:17 > 00:00:16 corba > 00:00:05 demos > 00:00:42 hotspot > 00:00:13 images > 00:00:12 jaxp > 00:00:18 jaxws > 00:01:23 jdk > 00:00:29 langtools > 00:00:12 nashorn > 00:03:50 TOTAL > ------------------------- > Finished building OpenJDK for target 'images' i.e. no mention of "bootcycle images" -- Jon From erik.joelsson at oracle.com Wed Jun 5 01:46:36 2013 From: erik.joelsson at oracle.com (Erik Joelsson) Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:46:36 +0200 Subject: RFE: bootcycle-images In-Reply-To: <51AE5602.6030801@oracle.com> References: <51AE5602.6030801@oracle.com> Message-ID: <51AEFAEC.1070700@oracle.com> I agree, bootcycle-images is currently a hack on top of the root makefiles. /Erik On 2013-06-04 23:02, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > It is somewhat inelgant and confusing that when I do "make > bootcycle-images" the build log ends with: > >> ## Finished images (build time 00:00:13) >> >> ----- Build times ------- >> Start 2013-06-04 13:10:27 >> End 2013-06-04 13:14:17 >> 00:00:16 corba >> 00:00:05 demos >> 00:00:42 hotspot >> 00:00:13 images >> 00:00:12 jaxp >> 00:00:18 jaxws >> 00:01:23 jdk >> 00:00:29 langtools >> 00:00:12 nashorn >> 00:03:50 TOTAL >> ------------------------- >> Finished building OpenJDK for target 'images' > > i.e. no mention of "bootcycle images" > > -- Jon From martijnverburg at gmail.com Wed Jun 5 06:43:09 2013 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:43:09 +0100 Subject: Build and Test guides & OpenJDK Wiki access Message-ID: Hi all, The Adopt OpenJDK programme (http://adoptopenjdk.java.net) has extensive wiki pages relating to building and testing OpenJDK (including IDE support), which we keep up to date on a regular basis - ( https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/AdoptOpenJDKBuildInstructionsas an example). I'm not currently recorded on the OpenJDK census (not sure if I qualify or not), but we'd like to start working with some folks who have the right Group/Project wiki access review what we have and to see if we can shift some of this material over to OpenJDK proper. Ongoing maintenance of these sorts of pages is also something that several of us would be happy to do, but there is the catch-22 that most (all?) of us aren't necessarily recorded in the Census. Not sure how to proceed... Cheers, Martijn From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Wed Jun 5 08:53:38 2013 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:53:38 +0100 Subject: RFE: bootcycle-images In-Reply-To: <51AEFAEC.1070700@oracle.com> References: <51AE5602.6030801@oracle.com> <51AEFAEC.1070700@oracle.com> Message-ID: <51AF5F02.7080209@oracle.com> On 05/06/2013 09:46, Erik Joelsson wrote: > I agree, bootcycle-images is currently a hack on top of the root > makefiles. > > /Erik One other thing to mention is that bootcycle-image builds emit a lot of noise because the javac and other tool commands used in the build specify PermGen options that don't make sense when using a jdk8 as the boot JDK. So if this build is re-visited then it would be nice if these options were dropped for second build. -Alan. From erik.joelsson at oracle.com Fri Jun 7 00:19:56 2013 From: erik.joelsson at oracle.com (Erik Joelsson) Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:19:56 +0200 Subject: RFE: bootcycle-images In-Reply-To: <51AF5F02.7080209@oracle.com> References: <51AE5602.6030801@oracle.com> <51AEFAEC.1070700@oracle.com> <51AF5F02.7080209@oracle.com> Message-ID: <51B1899C.6040505@oracle.com> Filed JDK-8016137. /Erik On 2013-06-05 17:53, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 05/06/2013 09:46, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> I agree, bootcycle-images is currently a hack on top of the root >> makefiles. >> >> /Erik > One other thing to mention is that bootcycle-image builds emit a lot > of noise because the javac and other tool commands used in the build > specify PermGen options that don't make sense when using a jdk8 as the > boot JDK. So if this build is re-visited then it would be nice if > these options were dropped for second build. > > -Alan. From pujarimahesh_kumar at yahoo.com Wed Jun 26 20:32:10 2013 From: pujarimahesh_kumar at yahoo.com (Mahesh Pujari) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Build bundle with debug enabled Message-ID: <1372303930.43263.YahooMailNeo@web142503.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Hi, ?Do we have bundle of OpenJDK-8 build with debug enabled (have debug symbols for hotspot/VM), so that we can debug the hotspot without building it locally. If it exists could any one please direct to me the location. thanks and regards, Mahesh Pujari