From gschrader at gmail.com  Mon Nov 24 23:12:43 2014
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:12:43 -0700
Subject: Java 8
Message-ID: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>

Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio with JDK
1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and have some
tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if anyone
else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141124/fdd299fb/attachment.html>

From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com  Mon Nov 24 23:29:28 2014
From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:29:28 +0100
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Glenn,

I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.

Cheers,
Mario

2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
> Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio with JDK
> 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and have some
> tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if anyone
> else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.



-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

From roman at kennke.org  Tue Nov 25 12:55:52 2014
From: roman at kennke.org (Roman Kennke)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:55:52 +0100
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>

Hi there,

there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
-> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.

Roman

Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
> Hi Glenn,
> 
> I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
> changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
> to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mario
> 
> 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
> > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio with JDK
> > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and have some
> > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if anyone
> > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
> 
> 
> 



From gschrader at gmail.com  Wed Nov 26 17:52:06 2014
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:52:06 -0700
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>

Looks to be some API changes even from later 7 builds, I guess I've been
lucky that things work as well as they do.  I've hacked together a patch
with a test that triggers my issue (with a JIDE popup component).  The JIDE
popup creates a new JWindow that probably is stealing the focus, so this
might be similar to the focus issue I was having a couple of years ago.

I've also modified the code so things will compile under JDK 8, I'm sure
what I did probably isn't correct though as I've only created empty methods
to satisfy the new interface methods.

I'll continue to poke around to see if I can track it down.

Thanks,
Glen



On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
> -> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
> best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
> OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
> possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.
>
> Roman
>
> Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
> > Hi Glenn,
> >
> > I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
> > changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
> > to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mario
> >
> > 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
> > > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio with
> JDK
> > > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and have
> some
> > > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if
> anyone
> > > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141126/e0ae67e5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jidefocusissue.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9065 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141126/e0ae67e5/jidefocusissue.patch>

From gschrader at gmail.com  Wed Nov 26 22:01:18 2014
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:01:18 -0700
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
	<CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAx7CFs+Xr2ygku3SZRaJ0WMjMLK4zzADyB7ZEeMwDXgNeme2g@mail.gmail.com>

Here is an updated patch that passes my test, it basically doesn't fire the
focus gain/lost events in FocusManager if the the new window isn't
focusable, I'm not sure if there is a cleaner way to handle this...



On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks to be some API changes even from later 7 builds, I guess I've been
> lucky that things work as well as they do.  I've hacked together a patch
> with a test that triggers my issue (with a JIDE popup component).  The JIDE
> popup creates a new JWindow that probably is stealing the focus, so this
> might be similar to the focus issue I was having a couple of years ago.
>
> I've also modified the code so things will compile under JDK 8, I'm sure
> what I did probably isn't correct though as I've only created empty methods
> to satisfy the new interface methods.
>
> I'll continue to poke around to see if I can track it down.
>
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
>> -> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
>> best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
>> OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
>> possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.
>>
>> Roman
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
>> > Hi Glenn,
>> >
>> > I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
>> > changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
>> > to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Mario
>> >
>> > 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
>> > > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio
>> with JDK
>> > > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and
>> have some
>> > > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if
>> anyone
>> > > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141126/2f81051a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jidefocusissue.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 11973 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141126/2f81051a/jidefocusissue-0001.patch>

From gschrader at gmail.com  Wed Nov 26 22:37:58 2014
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:37:58 -0700
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAAx7CFs+Xr2ygku3SZRaJ0WMjMLK4zzADyB7ZEeMwDXgNeme2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
	<CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAx7CFs+Xr2ygku3SZRaJ0WMjMLK4zzADyB7ZEeMwDXgNeme2g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAx7CFsaRhv3eAwx0-=SzW+Qwq2thJA50pbGvrTndzZN9t-ACw@mail.gmail.com>

No sooner did I get this working but found another case when there is
actually a focusable component in the popup where this fails.  So I'd say
there is something wrong with how focus is being tracked.  I'll see if I
can come up with another test case.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is an updated patch that passes my test, it basically doesn't fire
> the focus gain/lost events in FocusManager if the the new window isn't
> focusable, I'm not sure if there is a cleaner way to handle this...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Looks to be some API changes even from later 7 builds, I guess I've been
>> lucky that things work as well as they do.  I've hacked together a patch
>> with a test that triggers my issue (with a JIDE popup component).  The JIDE
>> popup creates a new JWindow that probably is stealing the focus, so this
>> might be similar to the focus issue I was having a couple of years ago.
>>
>> I've also modified the code so things will compile under JDK 8, I'm sure
>> what I did probably isn't correct though as I've only created empty methods
>> to satisfy the new interface methods.
>>
>> I'll continue to poke around to see if I can track it down.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Glen
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
>>> -> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
>>> best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
>>> OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
>>> possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.
>>>
>>> Roman
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
>>> > Hi Glenn,
>>> >
>>> > I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
>>> > changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
>>> > to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Mario
>>> >
>>> > 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
>>> > > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio
>>> with JDK
>>> > > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and
>>> have some
>>> > > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if
>>> anyone
>>> > > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141126/0eb5dc77/attachment.html>

From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 00:11:59 2014
From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 01:11:59 +0100
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
	<CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGUMyaQjUsR6fabiGX0TWmgXWM7W+50OmX5AAH5xNwh1q7Uhsw@mail.gmail.com>

2014-11-26 18:52 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
> Looks to be some API changes even from later 7 builds, I guess I've been
> lucky that things work as well as they do.

Most of the build failures are about specifics of AWT, while Cacio is
an AWT toolkit implementation I think your main use cases are about
Swing, so things keep working :)

We're also using it extensively in Thermostat, but yeah, this is not a
justification in not fixing it!

> I've hacked together a patch
> with a test that triggers my issue (with a JIDE popup component).  The JIDE
> popup creates a new JWindow that probably is stealing the focus, so this
> might be similar to the focus issue I was having a couple of years ago.
>
> I've also modified the code so things will compile under JDK 8, I'm sure
> what I did probably isn't correct though as I've only created empty methods
> to satisfy the new interface methods.

Thanks!

I don't remember if you signed the OCA already, did you?

Cheers,
Mario

-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

From emilian.bold at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 10:09:09 2014
From: emilian.bold at gmail.com (Emilian Bold)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:09:09 +0200
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAAx7CFsaRhv3eAwx0-=SzW+Qwq2thJA50pbGvrTndzZN9t-ACw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
	<CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAx7CFs+Xr2ygku3SZRaJ0WMjMLK4zzADyB7ZEeMwDXgNeme2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAx7CFsaRhv3eAwx0-=SzW+Qwq2thJA50pbGvrTndzZN9t-ACw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAL6R17AmKXarBFufL+V2HP6=j-KBCos-p+j5_CYojcQt087ZVw@mail.gmail.com>

@glen: we found regressions in JidePopup itself with Java 7. So you should
check it's not a JIDE bug first.

--emi

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:

> No sooner did I get this working but found another case when there is
> actually a focusable component in the popup where this fails.  So I'd say
> there is something wrong with how focus is being tracked.  I'll see if I
> can come up with another test case.
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Here is an updated patch that passes my test, it basically doesn't fire
>> the focus gain/lost events in FocusManager if the the new window isn't
>> focusable, I'm not sure if there is a cleaner way to handle this...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks to be some API changes even from later 7 builds, I guess I've been
>>> lucky that things work as well as they do.  I've hacked together a patch
>>> with a test that triggers my issue (with a JIDE popup component).  The JIDE
>>> popup creates a new JWindow that probably is stealing the focus, so this
>>> might be similar to the focus issue I was having a couple of years ago.
>>>
>>> I've also modified the code so things will compile under JDK 8, I'm sure
>>> what I did probably isn't correct though as I've only created empty methods
>>> to satisfy the new interface methods.
>>>
>>> I'll continue to poke around to see if I can track it down.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Glen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
>>>> -> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
>>>> best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
>>>> OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
>>>> possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.
>>>>
>>>> Roman
>>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
>>>> > Hi Glenn,
>>>> >
>>>> > I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
>>>> > changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
>>>> > to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Mario
>>>> >
>>>> > 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
>>>> > > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio
>>>> with JDK
>>>> > > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and
>>>> have some
>>>> > > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering
>>>> if anyone
>>>> > > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141127/a3d6c3a4/attachment.html>

From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 10:57:22 2014
From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:57:22 +0100
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <CAGUMyaRaYhBswx4-m5jxKF5BOE1BwEZp8b1q4LKvkChbCziW6w@mail.gmail.com>

If I get the GTK Laf JEP approved I won't have time for that, but I'll
put next into my queue and target JDK10.

CacioWeb won't be able to be merged, but the Buffered Image backend
can be surely done.

It would be interesting to do a Wayland port as well, this seems to be
the next big thing anyway.

Cheers,
Mario

2014-11-25 13:55 GMT+01:00 Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org>:
> Hi there,
>
> there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
> -> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
> best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
> OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
> possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.
>
> Roman
>
> Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
>> Hi Glenn,
>>
>> I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
>> changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
>> to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mario
>>
>> 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com>:
>> > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio with JDK
>> > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and have some
>> > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if anyone
>> > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

From gschrader at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 16:27:44 2014
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:27:44 -0700
Subject: Java 8
In-Reply-To: <CAL6R17AmKXarBFufL+V2HP6=j-KBCos-p+j5_CYojcQt087ZVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx7CFtuxvxY23w4h0ooN_O5AN_kvjGXjAWu1kG02eYed3NPMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUMyaQgf7QALG6FwCTM=sQJX=2nge_3u-NTCUDVoj0vrWfTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1416920152.6080.10.camel@localhost>
	<CAAx7CFuDm7evU4LEJrEqv=dxuo3MAy2Z1s=R=7Z=nCXvV9dvXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAx7CFs+Xr2ygku3SZRaJ0WMjMLK4zzADyB7ZEeMwDXgNeme2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAx7CFsaRhv3eAwx0-=SzW+Qwq2thJA50pbGvrTndzZN9t-ACw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL6R17AmKXarBFufL+V2HP6=j-KBCos-p+j5_CYojcQt087ZVw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5A25A869-8B16-4069-A0F5-38DBDA8A3013@gmail.com>

The popups seem to work fine (in both Java 7 and 8) for us, i.e. the tests pass when not using cacio.  I was able to workaround the Jide issue by using lightweight popups.

JidePopupFactory.setPopupType(JidePopup.LIGHT_WEIGHT_POPUP)


> On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Emilian Bold <emilian.bold at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> @glen: we found regressions in JidePopup itself with Java 7. So you should check it's not a JIDE bug first.
> 
> --emi
> 
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com <mailto:gschrader at gmail.com>> wrote:
> No sooner did I get this working but found another case when there is actually a focusable component in the popup where this fails.  So I'd say there is something wrong with how focus is being tracked.  I'll see if I can come up with another test case.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com <mailto:gschrader at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Here is an updated patch that passes my test, it basically doesn't fire the focus gain/lost events in FocusManager if the the new window isn't focusable, I'm not sure if there is a cleaner way to handle this...
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com <mailto:gschrader at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Looks to be some API changes even from later 7 builds, I guess I've been lucky that things work as well as they do.  I've hacked together a patch with a test that triggers my issue (with a JIDE popup component).  The JIDE popup creates a new JWindow that probably is stealing the focus, so this might be similar to the focus issue I was having a couple of years ago.
> 
> I've also modified the code so things will compile under JDK 8, I'm sure what I did probably isn't correct though as I've only created empty methods to satisfy the new interface methods.  
> 
> I'll continue to poke around to see if I can track it down.
> 
> Thanks,
> Glen
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org <mailto:roman at kennke.org>> wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> there probably have been some API changes in AWT from 7 -> 8 (and from 8
> -> 9), and cacio needs to be kept in sync with those. It would be the
> best solution to integrate cacio as a sort of internal API/feature into
> OpenJDK, that would make it much easier to maintain. If that is not
> possible, we'd need to have branches for each JDK versions I think.
> 
> Roman
> 
> Am Dienstag, den 25.11.2014 um 00:29 +0100 schrieb Mario Torre:
> > Hi Glenn,
> >
> > I still have to find time to port to OpenJKD8, there have been some
> > changes so I first need to port Cacio to the latest 7u and then port
> > to 8, unfortunately I didn't have much time for that yet.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mario
> >
> > 2014-11-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com <mailto:gschrader at gmail.com>>:
> > > Anyone still around here?  I'm wondering if anyone is using cacio with JDK
> > > 1.8, I'm just in the process of upgrading one of our projects and have some
> > > tests that are now failing with some focus issues.  I'm wondering if anyone
> > > else is seeing any issues before I start to dig in.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20141127/6fd6cbad/attachment-0001.html>