From gschrader at gmail.com  Wed Oct  2 17:32:25 2019
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:32:25 -0600
Subject: Using Caciocavallo code
In-Reply-To: <102E6778-96CF-497B-9149-C92F3007F47E@gmail.com>
References: <0E2BDB3F-43E5-4C71-98D1-18D9B3A36520@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaRQ+8MzFHMC+u8TC1fj0DT_cpSBjOSAf2B7DkwcsmEYwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <811758E4-9A80-4C43-B3EF-2EC451F02EB7@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaTJir3Oar0VKvvKs+AoOOmq9FM=uNwo_o_K4AcmOJgjBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <84BD3B50-ECA3-4751-AABE-0DF7EB98E5DF@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaRQfHXJ0X1g4cM9V0aTfX5nHoAqBiN4c9p58eU7ognLqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <102E6778-96CF-497B-9149-C92F3007F47E@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <339E56EB-8693-49F4-BE90-6878B47C9CE1@gmail.com>

I heard back from GitHub and sadly the name Caciocavallo is actually being used so I?ve gone with Mario?s suggestion of Caciocavallo Silano for the organization name.

https://github.com/CaciocavalloSilano/caciocavallo <https://github.com/CaciocavalloSilano/caciocavallo>

I see other people have imported the repos, so If people could give this project a star so it?s more apparent that this is the project going forward that would be great.

I?ll try to find some time soon to clean this up and get my JDK 11 changes in and figure out how to deploy to maven central.

Thanks,
Glen


> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:53 AM, Glen Schrader (gschrader) <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 30, 2019, at 5:40 AM, Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I think the mailing list is only really significant if you want to use
>> it for reviews (which is where Skara would help, since it makes the
>> bridge between GitHub and the mailing list automatic). As for the bug
>> database, historically Cacio predates the public Jira OpenJDK, so we
>> always used our own bugzilla:
>> 
>> https://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=Caciocavallo
>> 
>> I would be happy to hand you the "keys?.
> 
> 
> I only spot, 7 issues in there (4 without resolution) so maybe just manually copying them into GitHub Issues is the easiest.
> 
> 
>> 
>> I didn't, and I don't think Roman did either, we should probably
>> contact GitHub and see who owns that and if they are willing to
>> release it.
> 
> I sent GitHub a request, we?ll see what they say.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> I don't think there's any problem in changing it, although for
>> historical reasons we may want to keep it the same. If you refactor
>> the group id you should also change the packages though, for
>> consistency.
>> 
> 
> Given Dalibor?s comment, I guess changing it probably makes more sense. How about the copyright notices, I noticed there is a mix between Sun and Oracle and even a couple Red Hat notices thrown in. I assume those remain unchanged? What about current files that are missing one, should one be added?
> 
> Thanks,
> Glen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20191002/b02cddf3/attachment.html>

From gschrader at gmail.com  Sun Oct  6 18:16:45 2019
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:16:45 -0600
Subject: Using Caciocavallo code
In-Reply-To: <339E56EB-8693-49F4-BE90-6878B47C9CE1@gmail.com>
References: <0E2BDB3F-43E5-4C71-98D1-18D9B3A36520@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaRQ+8MzFHMC+u8TC1fj0DT_cpSBjOSAf2B7DkwcsmEYwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <811758E4-9A80-4C43-B3EF-2EC451F02EB7@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaTJir3Oar0VKvvKs+AoOOmq9FM=uNwo_o_K4AcmOJgjBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <84BD3B50-ECA3-4751-AABE-0DF7EB98E5DF@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaRQfHXJ0X1g4cM9V0aTfX5nHoAqBiN4c9p58eU7ognLqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <102E6778-96CF-497B-9149-C92F3007F47E@gmail.com>
 <339E56EB-8693-49F4-BE90-6878B47C9CE1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2F305E0C-52CE-4829-A79F-A1CCF21BD671@gmail.com>

I have finished my cleanup of the repos and also figured out the maven releases (yikes!). I have released 1.10 as a JDK8 version and 1.11 as a JDK11 version. I also converted from FEST to AssertJ Swing.

I?ve updated the readme to focus on the headless testing, I copied a bunch of information from Roman?s blog post so I hope you?re ok with that.

I?m still waiting for GitHub actions beta to be enabled on the repos  in order to get CI setup.

Cheers,
Glen

From emilian.bold at gmail.com  Sun Oct  6 19:25:46 2019
From: emilian.bold at gmail.com (Emilian Bold)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 22:25:46 +0300
Subject: Using Caciocavallo code
In-Reply-To: <2F305E0C-52CE-4829-A79F-A1CCF21BD671@gmail.com>
References: <0E2BDB3F-43E5-4C71-98D1-18D9B3A36520@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaRQ+8MzFHMC+u8TC1fj0DT_cpSBjOSAf2B7DkwcsmEYwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <811758E4-9A80-4C43-B3EF-2EC451F02EB7@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaTJir3Oar0VKvvKs+AoOOmq9FM=uNwo_o_K4AcmOJgjBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <84BD3B50-ECA3-4751-AABE-0DF7EB98E5DF@gmail.com>
 <CAGUMyaRQfHXJ0X1g4cM9V0aTfX5nHoAqBiN4c9p58eU7ognLqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <102E6778-96CF-497B-9149-C92F3007F47E@gmail.com>
 <339E56EB-8693-49F4-BE90-6878B47C9CE1@gmail.com>
 <2F305E0C-52CE-4829-A79F-A1CCF21BD671@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAL6R17AXos1dLP6oPXfK3rDqx6zNo-3=_n+r8qaQXYykJob-1w@mail.gmail.com>

Good job!

There is something odd about the way GitHub shows your commit
https://github.com/CaciocavalloSilano/caciocavallo/commit/02536d2ef518c33cffb873f14d2295f5327af0de#diff-598262b325290f782cad0a46e0c4ad69L1

You added a license header in CacioListPeer.java,
CacioTextFieldPeer.java, CTCRobotPeer.java when before there was none.

In CTCScreen.java the Oracle copyright is downgraded from 2014 to
2011. In CTCVolatileSurfaceManager.java from 2016 to 2011. It appears
as if git thinks WaylandGraphicsDevice.java was renamed to
CacioTestRunner.java... Really hard to figure it out.

--emi

On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 9:17 PM Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have finished my cleanup of the repos and also figured out the maven releases (yikes!). I have released 1.10 as a JDK8 version and 1.11 as a JDK11 version. I also converted from FEST to AssertJ Swing.
>
> I?ve updated the readme to focus on the headless testing, I copied a bunch of information from Roman?s blog post so I hope you?re ok with that.
>
> I?m still waiting for GitHub actions beta to be enabled on the repos  in order to get CI setup.
>
> Cheers,
> Glen

From gschrader at gmail.com  Mon Oct  7 00:48:16 2019
From: gschrader at gmail.com (Glen Schrader)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:48:16 -0600
Subject: Using Caciocavallo code
In-Reply-To: <CAL6R17AXos1dLP6oPXfK3rDqx6zNo-3=_n+r8qaQXYykJob-1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL6R17AXos1dLP6oPXfK3rDqx6zNo-3=_n+r8qaQXYykJob-1w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1A12E565-234C-48B5-B4C1-9972E95BDADC@gmail.com>

Yes that is strange how it is displaying some of the changes, I did add missing copyrights to files that were missing them based on a git blame.

> On Oct 6, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian.bold at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ?Good job!
> 
> There is something odd about the way GitHub shows your commit
> https://github.com/CaciocavalloSilano/caciocavallo/commit/02536d2ef518c33cffb873f14d2295f5327af0de#diff-598262b325290f782cad0a46e0c4ad69L1
> 
> You added a license header in CacioListPeer.java,
> CacioTextFieldPeer.java, CTCRobotPeer.java when before there was none.
> 
> In CTCScreen.java the Oracle copyright is downgraded from 2014 to
> 2011. In CTCVolatileSurfaceManager.java from 2016 to 2011. It appears
> as if git thinks WaylandGraphicsDevice.java was renamed to
> CacioTestRunner.java... Really hard to figure it out.
> 
> --emi
> 
>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 9:17 PM Glen Schrader <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I have finished my cleanup of the repos and also figured out the maven releases (yikes!). I have released 1.10 as a JDK8 version and 1.11 as a JDK11 version. I also converted from FEST to AssertJ Swing.
>> 
>> I?ve updated the readme to focus on the headless testing, I copied a bunch of information from Roman?s blog post so I hope you?re ok with that.
>> 
>> I?m still waiting for GitHub actions beta to be enabled on the repos  in order to get CI setup.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Glen

From ralf.spathelf at aicas.de  Fri Oct 18 07:25:27 2019
From: ralf.spathelf at aicas.de (Ralf Spathelf)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:25:27 +0200
Subject: Goodbye from aicas
Message-ID: <d31f8d2c-caa5-6565-872d-e3b968b1f8f4@aicas.de>

Hi all,

I will leave aicas at the end of the month. Most of you don't know me 
and not even aicas I guess, but at least Mario and Roman do. :-D

We haven't managed yet to release our version of Cacio on GitHub yet, 
and it's not clear to me if and when this will happen. Maybe this 
mailing list is still alive by then. ;-)

My focus will be on IOT (as I have the impression for almost everybody 
in the IT world) at SICK but I will keep my passion for graphics...

Cheers,
Ralf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20191018/539baa97/attachment.html>