Using Caciocavallo code

[Glen Schrader]

I heard back from GitHub and sadly the name Caciocavallo is actually being used so I’ve gone with Mario’s suggestion of Caciocavallo Silano for the organization name.

https://github.com/CaciocavalloSilano/caciocavallo <https://github.com/CaciocavalloSilano/caciocavallo>

I see other people have imported the repos, so If people could give this project a star so it’s more apparent that this is the project going forward that would be great.

I’ll try to find some time soon to clean this up and get my JDK 11 changes in and figure out how to deploy to maven central.

Thanks,
Glen


> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:53 AM, Glen Schrader (gschrader) <gschrader at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 30, 2019, at 5:40 AM, Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I think the mailing list is only really significant if you want to use
>> it for reviews (which is where Skara would help, since it makes the
>> bridge between GitHub and the mailing list automatic). As for the bug
>> database, historically Cacio predates the public Jira OpenJDK, so we
>> always used our own bugzilla:
>> 
>> https://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=Caciocavallo
>> 
>> I would be happy to hand you the "keys”.
> 
> 
> I only spot, 7 issues in there (4 without resolution) so maybe just manually copying them into GitHub Issues is the easiest.
> 
> 
>> 
>> I didn't, and I don't think Roman did either, we should probably
>> contact GitHub and see who owns that and if they are willing to
>> release it.
> 
> I sent GitHub a request, we’ll see what they say.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> I don't think there's any problem in changing it, although for
>> historical reasons we may want to keep it the same. If you refactor
>> the group id you should also change the packages though, for
>> consistency.
>> 
> 
> Given Dalibor’s comment, I guess changing it probably makes more sense. How about the copyright notices, I noticed there is a mix between Sun and Oracle and even a couple Red Hat notices thrown in. I assume those remain unchanged? What about current files that are missing one, should one be added?
> 
> Thanks,
> Glen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/caciocavallo-dev/attachments/20191002/b02cddf3/attachment.html>