Using Caciocavallo code

[Dalibor Topic]

On 30.09.2019 13:40, Mario Torre wrote:
>> The only other thing I can think of at the moment is being able to push new releases to maven central, I don’t know if maybe the group id should change to reflect the new home.
> 
> I don't think there's any problem in changing it, although for
> historical reasons we may want to keep it the same. If you refactor
> the group id you should also change the packages though, for
> consistency.

Generally speaking, if someone forks a project off OpenJDK to somewhere 
else, please make sure to change existing OpenJDK references such 
org.openjdk maven coordinates, etc. to avoid conflicts and confusion 
down the road if, for example, someone else chooses to continue with 
development within OpenJDK.

cheers,
dalibor topic
-- 
<http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Consulting Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961> | Video: dalibor.topic at oracle.com
<sip:dalibor.topic at oracle.com>

Oracle Global Services Germany GmbH
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRB 246209
Geschäftsführer: Ralf Herrmann

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment