CSR for Class-File API (Preview)

[Brian Goetz]

>
> To reflect this, can the end of this CSR section be rewritten to 
> something like "... that nothing too serious has changed. Providing a 
> class-file library as part of the JDK, always up-to-date with the new 
> JDK features, can mitigate most of these version skew problems."?

I don't have any objection to refining the message like this.  (This 
should happen in the JEP, though, not the CSR, because that's what most 
people will read.)