<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:0cfe9b98-fa89-967b-dfee-8bdf51a8c535@oracle.com"> <br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:3afccb21-d44b-4575-cf20-30736d329620@oracle.com"><font size="4"><font face="monospace">It is a little awkward that
the user feels like PC references are being adjusted in some
attributes (exception tables, local variable related
attributes), but not for TAs. Other than that looks good.</font></font><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font size="4"><font face="monospace">Yeah, the reality is that PC
references are such a tiny part of the brittleness of TA
attributes, that incurring lots of runtime cost for that one
seems entirely wasted.</font></font><br>
</blockquote>
<p><font size="4"><font face="monospace">That said, we could refine
your notion of "non-brittle attribute" to also include "it
refers to bytecodes via Label"</font></font></p>
<p><font size="4"><font face="monospace">Maurizio<br>
</font></font></p>
</body>
</html>