<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<font face="monospace" size="4">That does seem like a more
future-proof choice. (I suspect too it would be less intrusive to
adapt the internals to MS than BB.)</font><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/12/2025 11:53 AM, Maurizio
Cimadamore wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:16a12929-7ba7-417c-a8f4-aa0f04e5e11e@oracle.com">
<br>
On 10/03/2025 17:52, Brian Goetz wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">My first reaction is that the first seems
fine in theory
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I wonder if an API accepting a MemorySegment would be more general
-- you can construct a MS from a BB and you can of course go from
MS to byte[] (which is what the impl needs). So I wonder if that
would be more future-proof. (We can, of course, also provide
both).
<br>
<br>
Maurizio
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>