RFR: 8285094: Test java/awt/Frame/InvisibleOwner/InvisibleOwner.java failing on Linux

Alexander Zvegintsev azvegint at openjdk.java.net
Thu Apr 21 14:48:26 UTC 2022


On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 04:13:09 GMT, Phil Race <prr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> As discussed in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285094 it seems that the test
> java/awt/Frame/GetGraphicsStressTest/GetGraphicsStressTest.java destabilises the Xserver.
> This causes java/awt/Frame/InvisibleOwner/InvisibleOwner.java to fail and even before that
> other tests which do  pass are not visibly behaving as expected.
> 
> I didn't find any Xserver logs of "bad stuff" happening so it just seems like the Xserver was
> having trouble keeping up and JDK was behaving correctly as it could despite the Xserver sending
> lots of requests to repaint.
> 
> Just the "sleep" at the end of GetGraphicsStressTest.java seems to be enough but I'd already
> reworked InvisibleOwner.java and I'd like to think it is a bit better than before.

test/jdk/java/awt/Frame/InvisibleOwner/InvisibleOwner.java line 35:

> 33: import java.awt.EventQueue;
> 34: import java.awt.Frame;
> 35: import java.awt.Graphics;

Unused import

test/jdk/java/awt/Frame/InvisibleOwner/InvisibleOwner.java line 135:

> 133:                             ownedWindowBounds.y + ownedWindowBounds.height / 2);
> 134:             robot.mousePress(InputEvent.BUTTON1_MASK);
> 135:             robot.mouseRelease(InputEvent.BUTTON1_MASK);

Nit: Shouldn't we use BUTTON1_DOWN_MASK instead of deprecated BUTTON1_MASK?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8312



More information about the client-libs-dev mailing list