RFR: 4668290: unclear spec for Polygon.bounds field [v3]
Alexey Ivanov
aivanov at openjdk.org
Tue Dec 6 20:05:45 UTC 2022
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 21:18:45 GMT, Phil Race <prr at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> SWinxy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use javadoc code syntax for null
>
> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Polygon.java line 111:
>
>> 109: * {@link #getBounds()} called with {@link #npoints} being greater than
>> 110: * {@code 0} will transfer into a non-null {@link Rectangle}.
>> 111: *
>
> Another dubious piece of design. This should never have been exposed in the API.
> What we need to say here is
> /*
> * The value of this field is updated by the implementation which may set it to null and will
> * re-evaluate it as needed. Application sub-classes should never access this field.
> */
> And leave it at that.
I noticed one thing: Phil suggested “re-evaluate”, you used “reevaluate” without the hyphen.
I tend to use the hyphened version; at the same time, articles in the internet suggest the hyphen is unneeded in such words.
I'm fine with either.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10417
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list